Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course not but the same users would blame the SEC when they loose money. Just like silicon valley bank depositors
SVB went down due to the Fed’s aggressive interest rate hikes that left their loan portfolio underwater. “Management” or Any other explanation is pure propaganda, especially considering how it happened to FRB and how the government responded by implicitly guaranteeing every depositor in the banking system. Is every bank mismanaged? It was Kremlin levels of double talk.
SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world
171–180 of 294 posts
Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's really not any different than traditional cash. "Not your cash, not your money" also holds true. Storing lots of cash at home is even more difficult and risky. Keep your money at the bank? The govern can simply turn off your money for any reason. You're literally posting in a thread about the US government seeking to freeze Binance's accounts.
> The govern can simply turn off your money for any reason. This obviously happens so often /s
The article explains why cryptocurrencies are in use in Argentina despite the risks: mostly because Pesos or USD can have worse risks.
Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world
#173Under SEC logic, this action is meant to protect the users of Binance US who. According to SEC logic, those users the victims of malfeasance by Binance US and it's decuitful, fraudulent actions. I would ask: is there even a single Binance US user that wants the SEC to take custody of their assets? instead of sticking with Binance US?
Of course not but the same users would blame the SEC when they loose money. Just like silicon valley bank depositors
Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's no more illogical than, say, the progression of the SPX500 and Dow Jones Industrial stock market indexes between 2019-2020-2023. " How does the market not care vis-a-vis the gruelling recent pandemic, ongoing supply shocks, mounting climate change disasters, population curve declines, military instability ....... ? " In Bitcoin's case, it needs be remembered that: * Bitcoin as the original (and, in some ways, le…
> It's no more illogical than, say, the progression of the SPX500 and Dow Jones Industrial stock market indexes between 2019-2020-2023. > "How does the market not care vis-a-vis the gruelling recent pandemic, ongoing supply shocks, mounting climate change disasters, population curve declines, military instability ..... The progression was completely logical. Central banks deployed trillions in QE. Market participants…
Remove the double-negative in my phrase "no more illogical", and my argument is that there is logical cause-and-effect in both situations, despite the easy potential for assuming a different outcome based upon select, surface assumptions.
Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world
#175Another case of competition suppression by the US, that's sad..
Fun read from the former French Minister of Economy: https://twitter.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1665370246126125060
Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world
#176As the saying goes, this is good[1] for Bitcoin... As people are buying it, presumably in order to be able to flee their Binance positions. Nothing breeds confidence in the ecosystem like the world's largest exchange getting its funds frozen. [1] When it'll drop in price, I'll be here to provide different post-hoc justification for why that market swing happened. Tune in tomorrow, as the SEC keeps unraveling this rat…
Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world
#177Once again the use-case for crypto turns out to be... large scale criminality and fraud. Shocker.
Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
“a” use case that is indistinguishable and unquantifiable from use cases you respect which is a major difference from “the” use case and just a use case for that company, which in any other industry we would talk about the company’s behavior not the entire asset class and industry, I find it disingenuous to have that “use case” auto reply on any article that happens to be about crypto but is really about a company
That was an "ok" argument maybe 5-8 years ago, now there's too much evidence that no legitimate use case exists, and every alleged one turns out to be a fraud or a get-rich-quick scheme.
Re: SEC asks for emergency order to freeze Binance US assets anywhere in the world
#179The quality of discourse at this stage of the thread (2 hours, 20 comments) is incredibly disappointing. Hn usually has high quality discussions. What is it about crypto that causes us to lose our minds?
We’re sick of seeing frontpage news about the latest crypto scam and fallout.