Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really. They are both neoliberal, just with different market conditions.
Workers getting a large share of a company’s revenue, much of which is in the form of fractional ownership of the company sure sounds quasi-socialist to me! It doesn’t matter that market conditions led to this compensation scheme (as opposed to direct political intervention); what matters is the end result.
You can have full blown worker coops in the capitalist system, the question is if they are state mandated or not.
The definition of socialism isn't any sytem with a good outcome for workers.