Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you consider necessary for “good quality toothpaste?”
I’m not OP or american, but i can comment. >1,500ppm concentration of fluoride is prescription only (so you either pay for a pointless dentist visit or get it on the grey market), despite being safe and much more effective at remineralisation. There are also experimental ingredients such as nanohydroxyapatite and Novamin which are difficult to find on the american market due to the FDA
Health officials delayed report linking fluoride to brain harm
61–70 of 468 posts
Re: Health officials delayed report linking fluoride to brain harm
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m not OP or american, but i can comment. >1,500ppm concentration of fluoride is prescription only (so you either pay for a pointless dentist visit or get it on the grey market), despite being safe and much more effective at remineralisation. There are also experimental ingredients such as nanohydroxyapatite and Novamin which are difficult to find on the american market due to the FDA
Novamin used to be available via Sensodyne Pronamel in Canada. I was surprised to see that at some point it disappeared from our market - no longer able to buy at any grocery store or pharmacy or on Amazon, whereas it used to be available in all of these places.
Re: Health officials delayed report linking fluoride to brain harm
#63As a biochemist, this seems to be a very complex issue that has been unnecessarily politicized. What happened with this report is interesting in and of itself, but I would not draw any conclusions (or make any inferences) from this, frankly.
Re: Health officials delayed report linking fluoride to brain harm
#64It's worth thinking about the fact that virtually the entire EU gets by with non fluoridated water.
Re: Health officials delayed report linking fluoride to brain harm
#65There are significant lobbies now trying to put both statins and lithium into the tap water.
Re: Health officials delayed report linking fluoride to brain harm
#66As a biochemist, this seems to be a very complex issue that has been unnecessarily politicized. What happened with this report is interesting in and of itself, but I would not draw any conclusions (or make any inferences) from this, frankly.
[flagged]
Re: Health officials delayed report linking fluoride to brain harm
#67So we know that there is definitely little benefit from ingesting fluoride, and also that we can not rule out negative effects from ingesting fluoride. This seems like... a bit of a big deal?
Re: Health officials delayed report linking fluoride to brain harm
#68It's worth thinking about the fact that virtually the entire EU gets by with non fluoridated water.
I'm sorry but the difference you can literally just see between the teeth of US vs EU should disabuse you of the notion that they "get by".
Re: Health officials delayed report linking fluoride to brain harm
#69I don’t brush my teeth because I don’t want the residual fluoride there. It’s healthier to just slosh some vodka around to kill the germs (this wouldn’t work with kids, but hey they’ll lose their first teeth so who cares).
Apart from the hygienic value in brushing, whether you agree with it or not, halitosis is an offensive smell to most of the public. Some of the worst breath I’ve ever had to smell came from alcoholics whose spirit of choice is vodka.
Re: Health officials delayed report linking fluoride to brain harm
#70So we know that there is definitely little benefit from ingesting fluoride, and also that we can not rule out negative effects from ingesting fluoride. This seems like... a bit of a big deal?
Dose makes the poison. Literally any chemical in sufficient dose is poisonous