It’s really interesting how the US has managed to get a health system that’s extremely expensive, doesn’t cover everybody, is highly bureaucratic and complex, delivers below average outcomes and has overworked hospital staff. And somehow people defend this system because it works fine for the top few percent (especially the people in Congress) and people who have Medicare or VA.
Is there any country with a medical system that people don't complain about? For instance is there anyone in the world that would agree: "Gee, my healthcare is so cheap, it's surprising that it covers everything I want it to without me needing to go out of my way to justify my treatment options and I have so many medical professionals available to me at a moments notice!"
30% of All Rural Hospitals in the US Are at Risk of Closing [pdf]
61–70 of 163 posts
Re: 30% of All Rural Hospitals in the US Are at Risk of Closing [pdf]
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, but it's not as if all the people who live in these areas voted to shut down the hospitals. There's still a sizable portion of the electorate that wants good things and they get to suffer now. Not great.
It can be good as pain motivates, and hopefully they vote better or cause change vis different policies.
Re: 30% of All Rural Hospitals in the US Are at Risk of Closing [pdf]
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
The NHS is one of the most beloved institutions on the planet AFAICT. Of course everyone would prefer if everything were better all the time, but complaints about the US system and clearly not on the same plane as those about UK’s.
It used to be. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/press/press-releases/british-so...
Re: 30% of All Rural Hospitals in the US Are at Risk of Closing [pdf]
#64It’s really interesting how the US has managed to get a health system that’s extremely expensive, doesn’t cover everybody, is highly bureaucratic and complex, delivers below average outcomes and has overworked hospital staff. And somehow people defend this system because it works fine for the top few percent (especially the people in Congress) and people who have Medicare or VA.
>It’s really interesting how the US has managed to get a health system that’s extremely expensive, doesn’t cover everybody, is highly bureaucratic and complex, delivers below average outcomes and has overworked hospital staff. Well, most of Europe' social welfare systems were wiped out by the end of 1945 and were then rebooted with forethought and precedent of what not to do. The US is an archaic hodgepodge of system…
Re: 30% of All Rural Hospitals in the US Are at Risk of Closing [pdf]
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
The NHS is one of the most beloved institutions on the planet AFAICT. Of course everyone would prefer if everything were better all the time, but complaints about the US system and clearly not on the same plane as those about UK’s.
I see sentiments like this echoed quite a lot regarding the NHS, similar for Canada's: https://www.reddit.com/r/unpopularopinion/comments/upoamh/th...
Re: 30% of All Rural Hospitals in the US Are at Risk of Closing [pdf]
#66I don't know how you can realistically look at this without thinking of the "I never thought leopards would eat MY face!!" meme. Politics matters. Voters in rural areas (generally, of course) have consistently voted against policies that would help support health care in these rural locations, such voting in politicians who are staunchly against Obamacare, who refuse any expansion or even adequate support for Medicai…
Re: 30% of All Rural Hospitals in the US Are at Risk of Closing [pdf]
#67It’s really interesting how the US has managed to get a health system that’s extremely expensive, doesn’t cover everybody, is highly bureaucratic and complex, delivers below average outcomes and has overworked hospital staff. And somehow people defend this system because it works fine for the top few percent (especially the people in Congress) and people who have Medicare or VA.
Re: 30% of All Rural Hospitals in the US Are at Risk of Closing [pdf]
#68One other factor triggering closures in the article: private equity companies have been on a buying spree for hospitals. The strategy is to buy the hospital, sell the land to a real estate co, and have the hospital pay exorbitant rates to lease the land. After they’ve extracted maximal value, the hospitals that can’t afford the lease are forced to close. Hospital execs get paid large bonuses for agreeing to deals lik…
By whom?
Re: 30% of All Rural Hospitals in the US Are at Risk of Closing [pdf]
#69How much do we want to subsidize people who choose to live in less populated areas? This will probably come up with roads and utilities at some point, also. Did we build a lot of infrastructure in less dense areas during boom times, similar to how China was recently building, with little regard for the long term sustainability costs? One day some of those currently paved roads in the country may need to be allowed to…
> Perhaps the companies profiting from these activities should pay? This is how you get company towns, and they don't have exactly stellar history.
Farming for example has already become quite automated, not so many actual people are needed. Same for mining.
Should everyone who chooses to move to the middle of get a paved road and emergency room subsidized by others? Or just the people who are grandfathered in? Wouldn't it make more sense for these people to move if their needs are not being met, as so many already have?
Re: 30% of All Rural Hospitals in the US Are at Risk of Closing [pdf]
#70I don't know how you can realistically look at this without thinking of the "I never thought leopards would eat MY face!!" meme. Politics matters. Voters in rural areas (generally, of course) have consistently voted against policies that would help support health care in these rural locations, such voting in politicians who are staunchly against Obamacare, who refuse any expansion or even adequate support for Medicai…
Yet in Canada we have this same issue.
(Sarcasm, of course, every single problem in the USA comes neatly down on political lines and one side is perfectly good and the other objectively evil).