https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999402/
If these are accurate does it make sense for them to be entirely inhibited by general anesthetic?
21–30 of 196 posts
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999402/
If these are accurate does it make sense for them to be entirely inhibited by general anesthetic?
> They gave volunteers ketamine while they were under general anesthesia, theoretically preventing the participants from going on a trip. Maybe it's the trip that helps.
And you object to them trying to find out if it does?
The notion that the trip is the therapeutic element seems oddly frightening or threatening to a lot of people.
… Or at least it’s not what they’re looking for. The quest is for a pill that works deterministically without any need to involve consciousness.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, what they're trying to do is provide better blinding. Doing proper blind studies of ketamine is quite hard because its subjective effects are far too noticable. That line just says people should do better at this in future to get more accurate results. It's not a statement about the ultimate form the treatment should take.
yes ofc, but if the treatment is the trip it will never work blinding it like this. If anything they should be looking for drugs that give comparable trips, with no potential for depression treatment.
I believe benzodiazepines have also been tried as an active placebo but I don't remember what the results were.
> They gave volunteers ketamine while they were under general anesthesia, theoretically preventing the participants from going on a trip. Maybe it's the trip that helps.
As a relatively seasoned meditator, I am absolutely sure that this is the trip that helps, not the chemistry. One way to look at meditation (and, I hear, psychedelics) that fits my experience is that it has the potential effect of opening the range of "ways of looking", to change the way one builds the perceived world. What propulsed my meditation to a totally different level was to see it as a practice of actively e…
One of the people using it said it basically had cured her self-perception issues; she had been bullied for her looks as a child and internalized that she was ugly. But as an adult when she saw her younger face in the app, she realized immediately how the characterization of that face as ugly was just the perception of child bullies.
And it wasn't something that photographs could do for her -- it was the fact that it was her younger face superimposed on her current body, and that it was moving as she moved which gave her a new "way of looking" as you put it. In a sense, AI gave her a chemical-free trip.
Unusual is an understatement. This just seems ill-conceived to me. You can't eliminate one effect on the brain by introducing other effects on the brain that might have their own consequences for the results. All this shows is that ketamine while under general anaesthesia is not more efficacious than placebo. Ok then. This just seems like a failed attempt to introduce better blinding to me. I'm not convinced it sheds…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't post lies and FUD here please.
If you're gonna accuse someone of posting lies and FUD, at least have some sort of reference [0] to point to, please. Otherwise you're just participating in a "uh-huh!", "nuh-uh!" pissing contest. [0] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-022-01661-0
Also, given that they are typically preferred over other classes of anti-depressants (try-cyclics etc), we also know they have demonstrated better effectiveness than other drugs.
Given all this, it is obviously up to the person flippantly contradicting well-established medical practice to provide citations, or rightfully be accused of spreading FUD.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And you object to them trying to find out if it does?
The problem is that their conclusion is not going to be read as “wow, it’s the trip that helps more than just the chemical.” Instead it’ll be read as “well I guess this chemical doesn’t work at all.” The notion that the trip is the therapeutic element seems oddly frightening or threatening to a lot of people. … Or at least it’s not what they’re looking for. The quest is for a pill that works deterministically without…
To me, ketamine isn't really "enjoyable" or seem to modify my mood directly or anything like that. What it does do is shift my perspective for a few minutes and makes me introspective in ways I can only see as healthy.
Sometimes I think about my wife, my children, my finances, my work, my parents, cleaning the bathroom, whatever life issues I might be struggling with at that moment but the perspective shift brings a clarity to the issue and the solution seems obvious. I often want to jump off the couch and feel invigorated and motivated. (Of course ketamine also makes you fatigued so it's a bit of a strange mix of feelings). I mentally want to do things but physically I am not able to—that's fine though.
I'm also an experienced meditator and have done traditional psychedelics, neither of those have improved my life as much as ketamine has. Meditation is simply really hard for me despite over a decade of trying and failing to make it a daily habit. Psychedelics work very well for introspection, but they're also terrifying and in my mid-30's I am pretty sure this is something I'm content with not needing to deal with again.
I once heard someone say that psychedelics are like color TV and ketamine is black-and-white. Somehow this describes the feeling exactly to me. Ketamine isn't nearly as intense as LSD/psilocybin and that's the best part IMO.
My life is in relatively good shape, but a monthly-ish tune-up with ketamine seems to have really been effective.