Earlier quoted context omitted.
He could've closed the door in their faces and there would be nothing they could do about it. The company relied on theatrics and false threats to get back a legitimately purchased product.
Could've, but theatrics are used because it's effective. A surprise morning visit by professional intimidators arguing that you "do what we say or you might spend the next decade in jail" can override a lot of logical reasoning.
Wizards of the Coast Raids YouTuber’s House to Take Back Magic Cards
41–50 of 216 posts
Re: Wizards of the Coast Raids YouTuber’s House to Take Back Magic Cards
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could've, but theatrics are used because it's effective. A surprise morning visit by professional intimidators arguing that you "do what we say or you might spend the next decade in jail" can override a lot of logical reasoning.
That's why it needs to be a crime to impersonate law enforcement. I thought it was already, but here we are.
Re: Wizards of the Coast Raids YouTuber’s House to Take Back Magic Cards
#43Lucky they didn't get shot. A private entity has no right to raid your house. That is some extremely ballsy behavior for a non-state actor in the US.
Re: Wizards of the Coast Raids YouTuber’s House to Take Back Magic Cards
#44Lucky they didn't get shot. A private entity has no right to raid your house. That is some extremely ballsy behavior for a non-state actor in the US.
Did they threaten violence? Do you consider if reasonable or likely that a private citizen would shoot an unarmed, nonviolent person at their door?
Re: Wizards of the Coast Raids YouTuber’s House to Take Back Magic Cards
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could've, but theatrics are used because it's effective. A surprise morning visit by professional intimidators arguing that you "do what we say or you might spend the next decade in jail" can override a lot of logical reasoning.
That's why it needs to be a crime to impersonate law enforcement. I thought it was already, but here we are.
Re: Wizards of the Coast Raids YouTuber’s House to Take Back Magic Cards
#46Lucky they didn't get shot. A private entity has no right to raid your house. That is some extremely ballsy behavior for a non-state actor in the US.
Did they threaten violence? Do you consider if reasonable or likely that a private citizen would shoot an unarmed, nonviolent person at their door?
Re: Wizards of the Coast Raids YouTuber’s House to Take Back Magic Cards
#47Wizards of the Coast seems to be on a rampage to do as much damage to their brand as possible. Weren't they pretty beloved by fans before some of these more recent actions? It's like they've turned into the Comcast of table top games. What do they really have beyond their brand? People can play other games.
Re: Wizards of the Coast Raids YouTuber’s House to Take Back Magic Cards
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
American law enforcement would overwhelmingly "side" with the buyer here, by virtue solely of siding with the status quo. The moment they said "contract," Deputy Notmyjob will hold up a hand and say, "Sounds like a civil matter. Mr. Smith has advised you not to trespass on his property. Small claims office is at 1234 Fuckoff Street downtown. We'll be leaving now, and you will too, unless you'd like to take a trip to…
It depends. If Dealer's lawyers decided they wanted to go after some transgression which may or may not have occurred, that can cause a lot of difficulty for Buyer. Individual officers are pretty likely to point them to small claims but not if a prosecutor is in the picture.
Re: Wizards of the Coast Raids YouTuber’s House to Take Back Magic Cards
#49I get that the youtuber just wanted no trouble, but he may have really screwed himself by not insisting on a waver of liability, agreement that the existing videos can stay up (or, alternatively, compensation to replace the lost income from them), and compensation for his costs at a minimum. Handing WOTC's paid thugs the material probably didn't do anything to reduce his risk and took away the little leverage he had…
>that his possession was unlawful. There is no law being broken so it does not matter what he said or did.