The Annexes ( https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/annexes/ ) contain a definition of "High risks AI systems" at Annex III. -- Incidentally, for the many who claimed on these pages that we would not "have a definition of AI" (actually we have several), well, this legislative text provides one: software with the ability, for a given set of human-defined objectives, to generate outputs such as content, predictions, rec…
“Symbolic reasoning” used to make “decisions which influence the environment with which the system interacts” could describe almost all real world computer systems, could it not?
EU Artificial Intelligence Act
31–40 of 129 posts
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#32There was a great article on this recently that cuts through the EU’s dressing: EU AI Act To Target US Open Source Software https://technomancers.ai/eu-ai-act-to-target-us-open-source-... TLDR it imposes ridiculous constraints on github and open source developers
That site has some questionalble views, for example https://technomancers.ai/pardon-elizabeth-holmes/
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#33There was a great article on this recently that cuts through the EU’s dressing: EU AI Act To Target US Open Source Software https://technomancers.ai/eu-ai-act-to-target-us-open-source-... TLDR it imposes ridiculous constraints on github and open source developers
I don't know, my impression is that this is written by someone who doesn't understand how law works and making hyperbolic assumptions through cherrypicking. I recall a similar panic and outrage when GDPR was introduced, claiming that it will bankrupt startups and small projects etc. The EU stuff is usually against large corporations who pose systematic risks. Think about how TikTok makes the US freak out about China…
They just end up making their local tech entrepreneurs flee to US/UK.
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#34“applications, such as a CV-scanning tool that ranks job applicants, are subject to specific legal requirement”
This is a continuation of EU logic first seen in GDPR around what that law calls “automated decision making”.
All I can say is that GDPR hasn’t had a good effect. Partly because It’s not well written from a technical perspective.
GDPR demands explainable and auditable automation. Non-deterministic AI systems make this difficult or impossible with current tech. So to be “compliant”, vendors dumb-down their software to use explainable methods and often inferior hiring decisions are made because users have to operate on untenable amounts of data using basic sorts. So the Talent Acquisition team end up structuring the hiring process around “disqualifers” such as resume gaps, education requirements, pre-interview qualification tests, etc.
It reminds me of an old recruiting joke:
“Recruiter: You said you only wanted to interview the 5 best applicants but we are getting so many applicants we don’t know where to start.
Hiring Manager: OK, first, I only hire lucky people. Print out all of the resumes and throw away every other one.”
Interestingly, if this process is done randomly without reviewing the resume, it’s considered legal.
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know, my impression is that this is written by someone who doesn't understand how law works and making hyperbolic assumptions through cherrypicking. I recall a similar panic and outrage when GDPR was introduced, claiming that it will bankrupt startups and small projects etc. The EU stuff is usually against large corporations who pose systematic risks. Think about how TikTok makes the US freak out about China…
We've been there with GDPR. It didn't help creating the level playing field they officially wanted to achieve. BigTech has law departments whilst local tech startups have to deal with legal battles initiated by third-class legal firms crawling the web. They just end up making their local tech entrepreneurs flee to US/UK.
Really? Which startups flee due to GDPR?
In my experience as a user, I now have option to download my data and know what's collected about me. I like it.
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
The quoted sentence is about training data, not about the output of the model, they're different things.
I wonder what "representative" means in relation to human behavior? does it mean "must collect ALL data"?
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#37Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder what "representative" means in relation to human behavior? does it mean "must collect ALL data"?
Of course not, there's no meaning of representative that requires this.
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#39Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
We've been there with GDPR. It didn't help creating the level playing field they officially wanted to achieve. BigTech has law departments whilst local tech startups have to deal with legal battles initiated by third-class legal firms crawling the web. They just end up making their local tech entrepreneurs flee to US/UK.
> They just end up making their local tech entrepreneurs flee to US/UK. Really? Which startups flee due to GDPR? In my experience as a user, I now have option to download my data and know what's collected about me. I like it.
[0] https://investors.biontech.de/news-releases/news-release-det...