Live data from Hacker News

EU Artificial Intelligence Act

artificialintelligenceact.eu

21–30 of 129 posts

Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act

#21

Article 10 requires that > all training data be "relevant, representative, free of errors and complete." This is especially interesting to me with regard to something like ChatGPT. As we know, ChatGPT occasionally gives factually incorrect information. Does this mean that, in its current form, it would be illegal in EU? We know that Google is currently blocking access to Bard in EU. Will ChatGPT be forced to follow s…

The quoted sentence is about training data, not about the output of the model, they're different things.

Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act

#22

Why is everyone in a hurry to regulate AI? I can't think of one example where someone was harmed by an LLM. Besides "AI" is largely a marketing term, most software has "AI" elements and that has been the case for a while now, this thing has "unintended consequences" written all over it.

They're regulators. That's what they do. That's all they do.

[deleted]

Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act

#23

Article 10 requires that > all training data be "relevant, representative, free of errors and complete." This is especially interesting to me with regard to something like ChatGPT. As we know, ChatGPT occasionally gives factually incorrect information. Does this mean that, in its current form, it would be illegal in EU? We know that Google is currently blocking access to Bard in EU. Will ChatGPT be forced to follow s…

From I read earlier (I did not waste time on this article again) EU rules in the propisal that is not definite are about critical stuff.

I agree that would be idiotic to let some greedy bastards sell some MedicalGPT to us, or PoliceGPT, SurveilenceGPT.

Imagine the MedicaGPT will give you different treatment each time you ask since is not deterministic, or if you change the patient name from Bob to John then it gives you some wild results because test data had tons of hon Smiths in and nobody can explain this AIs reasoning.

So IMO for critical systems we need good rules for safety reasons, for non critical systems we need transparency and if you sell an AI product you should also take responsibility if it performs worse then you advertise. Like you can't SELL me a GPT for schools with a shit disclaimer "it might be wrong sometimes and teach the students wrong stuff, or it might sometimes be NSFW" , IMO fuck this ToS where this giants sell us stuff and take no responsibility on the quality of the product.

Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act

#24
I was trying to understand more about AIA today after it was mentioned a few times in the oversight committee thing. Found this talk, it's is pretty good, I thought it was going to be lame content marketing but the guest is a real lawyer who seems to have a real understanding of AI and what is going on:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoIC5EPPfn4

(feel like all my HN posts are always revealing the embarrassing about of youtube I watch)

Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act

#25

There was a great article on this recently that cuts through the EU’s dressing: EU AI Act To Target US Open Source Software https://technomancers.ai/eu-ai-act-to-target-us-open-source-... TLDR it imposes ridiculous constraints on github and open source developers

I don't know, my impression is that this is written by someone who doesn't understand how law works and making hyperbolic assumptions through cherrypicking. I recall a similar panic and outrage when GDPR was introduced, claiming that it will bankrupt startups and small projects etc.

The EU stuff is usually against large corporations who pose systematic risks. Think about how TikTok makes the US freak out about China spying and manipulations, for EU it's the the same thing but include Facebook and all other large social media too(because American corporations are foreign in Europe like TikTok is foreign in USA). US considers banning TikTok, EU's approach is to regulate how data is processed and used in order to keep open market and mitigate risks.

So as a rule of thumb, Europol doesn't knock on your door when you train a model on data that doesn't meet the requirements. This is probably designed to make countries introduce laws which will hold Google/OpenAI etc. accountable for their services so they can't just shrug and say "ouppsy, it's not our fault the AI did it".

I'm sorry to pop the alarmist narrative, but this is not the legislation which is going to "get you".

Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act

#26
post #21

Article 10 requires that > all training data be "relevant, representative, free of errors and complete." This is especially interesting to me with regard to something like ChatGPT. As we know, ChatGPT occasionally gives factually incorrect information. Does this mean that, in its current form, it would be illegal in EU? We know that Google is currently blocking access to Bard in EU. Will ChatGPT be forced to follow s…

The quoted sentence is about training data, not about the output of the model, they're different things.

I wonder what "representative" means in relation to human behavior?

does it mean "must collect ALL data"?

Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act

#28
post #15

There was a great article on this recently that cuts through the EU’s dressing: EU AI Act To Target US Open Source Software https://technomancers.ai/eu-ai-act-to-target-us-open-source-... TLDR it imposes ridiculous constraints on github and open source developers

That site has some questionalble views, for example https://technomancers.ai/pardon-elizabeth-holmes/

This seems like an ad hominem. Why not engage with the content of the artcicle before hand waving it away?

Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act

#30

Article 10 requires that > all training data be "relevant, representative, free of errors and complete." This is especially interesting to me with regard to something like ChatGPT. As we know, ChatGPT occasionally gives factually incorrect information. Does this mean that, in its current form, it would be illegal in EU? We know that Google is currently blocking access to Bard in EU. Will ChatGPT be forced to follow s…

Will be interesting for copilot, given all the buggy half finished projects on github that would have been included in it's training data.
Post reply on HN