Article 10 requires that > all training data be "relevant, representative, free of errors and complete." This is especially interesting to me with regard to something like ChatGPT. As we know, ChatGPT occasionally gives factually incorrect information. Does this mean that, in its current form, it would be illegal in EU? We know that Google is currently blocking access to Bard in EU. Will ChatGPT be forced to follow s…
EU Artificial Intelligence Act
21–30 of 129 posts
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#22Why is everyone in a hurry to regulate AI? I can't think of one example where someone was harmed by an LLM. Besides "AI" is largely a marketing term, most software has "AI" elements and that has been the case for a while now, this thing has "unintended consequences" written all over it.
They're regulators. That's what they do. That's all they do.
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#23Article 10 requires that > all training data be "relevant, representative, free of errors and complete." This is especially interesting to me with regard to something like ChatGPT. As we know, ChatGPT occasionally gives factually incorrect information. Does this mean that, in its current form, it would be illegal in EU? We know that Google is currently blocking access to Bard in EU. Will ChatGPT be forced to follow s…
I agree that would be idiotic to let some greedy bastards sell some MedicalGPT to us, or PoliceGPT, SurveilenceGPT.
Imagine the MedicaGPT will give you different treatment each time you ask since is not deterministic, or if you change the patient name from Bob to John then it gives you some wild results because test data had tons of hon Smiths in and nobody can explain this AIs reasoning.
So IMO for critical systems we need good rules for safety reasons, for non critical systems we need transparency and if you sell an AI product you should also take responsibility if it performs worse then you advertise. Like you can't SELL me a GPT for schools with a shit disclaimer "it might be wrong sometimes and teach the students wrong stuff, or it might sometimes be NSFW" , IMO fuck this ToS where this giants sell us stuff and take no responsibility on the quality of the product.
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#24https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoIC5EPPfn4
(feel like all my HN posts are always revealing the embarrassing about of youtube I watch)
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#25There was a great article on this recently that cuts through the EU’s dressing: EU AI Act To Target US Open Source Software https://technomancers.ai/eu-ai-act-to-target-us-open-source-... TLDR it imposes ridiculous constraints on github and open source developers
The EU stuff is usually against large corporations who pose systematic risks. Think about how TikTok makes the US freak out about China spying and manipulations, for EU it's the the same thing but include Facebook and all other large social media too(because American corporations are foreign in Europe like TikTok is foreign in USA). US considers banning TikTok, EU's approach is to regulate how data is processed and used in order to keep open market and mitigate risks.
So as a rule of thumb, Europol doesn't knock on your door when you train a model on data that doesn't meet the requirements. This is probably designed to make countries introduce laws which will hold Google/OpenAI etc. accountable for their services so they can't just shrug and say "ouppsy, it's not our fault the AI did it".
I'm sorry to pop the alarmist narrative, but this is not the legislation which is going to "get you".
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#26Article 10 requires that > all training data be "relevant, representative, free of errors and complete." This is especially interesting to me with regard to something like ChatGPT. As we know, ChatGPT occasionally gives factually incorrect information. Does this mean that, in its current form, it would be illegal in EU? We know that Google is currently blocking access to Bard in EU. Will ChatGPT be forced to follow s…
The quoted sentence is about training data, not about the output of the model, they're different things.
does it mean "must collect ALL data"?
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#27Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#28There was a great article on this recently that cuts through the EU’s dressing: EU AI Act To Target US Open Source Software https://technomancers.ai/eu-ai-act-to-target-us-open-source-... TLDR it imposes ridiculous constraints on github and open source developers
That site has some questionalble views, for example https://technomancers.ai/pardon-elizabeth-holmes/
Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#29Re: EU Artificial Intelligence Act
#30Article 10 requires that > all training data be "relevant, representative, free of errors and complete." This is especially interesting to me with regard to something like ChatGPT. As we know, ChatGPT occasionally gives factually incorrect information. Does this mean that, in its current form, it would be illegal in EU? We know that Google is currently blocking access to Bard in EU. Will ChatGPT be forced to follow s…