Live data from Hacker News

U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr

theintercept.com

181–190 of 268 posts

Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr

#181
post #45

So many people are okay with unconstitutional things as long as it supports their side and beliefs. It is genuinely unsettling. Personally, I don’t care about the underlying thing the protests are about, the important aspect is that if you allow unconstitutional government action like this, eventually it will be used against you. A decade from now we have no idea what the political climate will be. If the precedent i…

> Personally, I don’t care about the underlying thing the protests are about, the important aspect is that if you allow unconstitutional government action like this, eventually it will be used against you. Words won't protect you. Precedent won't protect you. Guns won't protect you. If you are in a society where others want you surveiled or dead or removed or heavily restricted, and you're outnumbered, it's already t…

If guns will not protect you, why did Stalin, Hitler and Castro go to such lengths of seizing privately owned firearms?

Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not that the sides no longer agree that these things are important. They do. The problem is they don't believe they agree that they're important. They believe the other side has abandoned the constitution, and they know that puts their own side at a disadvantage if they stay with it. The two sides are so frightened of each other at this point that all assumptions of good faith are off the table. So, note for nex…

It's pretty hard to have good faith to people who have bullied and been deceptive to attain their goal of undermining bodily autonomy.

When you're talking about undermining bodily autonomy are you talking about Republican states banning abortion or Democrat states compelling vaccination?

Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr

#183
post #45

So many people are okay with unconstitutional things as long as it supports their side and beliefs. It is genuinely unsettling. Personally, I don’t care about the underlying thing the protests are about, the important aspect is that if you allow unconstitutional government action like this, eventually it will be used against you. A decade from now we have no idea what the political climate will be. If the precedent i…

I get what you're saying, but on the other hand abortion protesters have a habit of assassinating doctors that perform abortions.

Unlike the assassin who showed up outside Kavanaughs door.

Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/251553/map-vandalism...

While not insignificant overall, they are a drop in the bucket compared to violence against pro-choice. This is also a report on "vandalism", and I think we could all agree that aggravated battery and murder, are worse crimes, of which none has been committed by pro-choice groups.

Both sides seem to say the other side only encounters a drop in the bucket. Can you provide some data or source like the other guy did?

Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Personally, I don’t care about the underlying thing the protests are about, the important aspect is that if you allow unconstitutional government action like this, eventually it will be used against you. Words won't protect you. Precedent won't protect you. Guns won't protect you. If you are in a society where others want you surveiled or dead or removed or heavily restricted, and you're outnumbered, it's already t…

Very true. I have my issues with the Netherlands (no country is perfect) but the majority is atheist and religion holds no power here.

You're reaping the dividends of a much, much higher level of public education which I don't know when we'll see in a country as vast, federated, and new worldy as the U.S. :c

Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr

#186
post #35
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with your assertion that there is a big difference here, in that anti-abortion protestors are far more likely to resort to domestic terrorism to get their way. Pro-choice protestors don't have a history of bombing health clinics, that's something reserved for the people you claim "take peaceful action". History has something quite different to say: https://www.vox.com/2015/12/1/9827886/abortion-clinic-attack.…

According to the FBI director this is not true. Since Dobbs 70% of violence has been against pro life centers. Skip to 1:45 in the video for the exact quote. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pro-life-centers-targeted-7...

You're using the wrong metric. Pro abortion protestors broke a large number of windows. Anti abortion protestors shot a handful of people. The appropriate comparison is not number of incidents.

Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Abortion was illegal in every state in the US by 1910. Let's be clear about what was illegal, because the radical definition, 'life begins at fertilization', is a recent innovation[1]: > Abortion was not always a crime. During the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, abortion of early pregnancy was legal under common law.[22] Abortions were illegal only after "quickening," the point at which a pregnant woman…

I’m not talking about the common law. Due to medical advances in the 1800s, abortion was illegal at all stages of pregnancy in the US by 1910. Also, “life begins at conception,” or at another very early stage, isn’t a Christian innovation. That’s the belief in Shia Islam. Certain Sunni schools also prohibit abortion at any stage. In Thailand, a Buddhist country, abortion was illegal at all stages of pregnancy until 2…

These are all great examples of the bandwagon fallacy, but if we're going off popular appeal then why don't we see the abortion debates put to rest once and for all by popular vote?

The answer of course is that abortion rights would win by a healthy margin[1] if the public had any say in the matter.

> Pro-choice sentiment is now the highest Gallup has measured since 1995 when it was 56% -- the only other time it has been at the current level or higher -- while the 39% identifying as "pro-life" is the lowest since 1996.

[1] https://news.gallup.com/poll/393104/pro-choice-identificatio...

Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Monitoring an active riot seems pretty much what I’d expect the FBI to do. It doesn’t seem that there was any intimidation of peaceful protesters, which obviously would be concerning.

> Monitoring an active riot seems pretty much what I’d expect the FBI to do. What - if any - is the difference between a riot and a protest?

In the US, a protest is organized, but not violent and doesn’t disturb the peace.

Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr

#189
post #45

So many people are okay with unconstitutional things as long as it supports their side and beliefs. It is genuinely unsettling. Personally, I don’t care about the underlying thing the protests are about, the important aspect is that if you allow unconstitutional government action like this, eventually it will be used against you. A decade from now we have no idea what the political climate will be. If the precedent i…

You have highlighted the core basis of Foucault's Boomarang: it doesn't matter the target of oppresive technologies and practices. Sooner or later, their scope will be turned on you.

"At first they came for X and I said nothing".

Unfortunately, we are about 10 lines into that, and the election of 1 president and 1 key turn from the rest.

To emphasize this, if Facebook knows who practically everyone is in the US (indirectly or directly), then sure as fucking hell the government does. All it takes is one guy that wants to do the McCarthy "unAmerican" bullshit and has enough to do it and the US Government will know EXACTLY who to target.

Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Monitoring an active riot seems pretty much what I’d expect the FBI to do. It doesn’t seem that there was any intimidation of peaceful protesters, which obviously would be concerning.

> Monitoring an active riot seems pretty much what I’d expect the FBI to do. What - if any - is the difference between a riot and a protest?

> What - if any - is the difference between a riot and a protest?

Whether people are being intentionally injured and property is being intentionally damaged/stolen.

Post reply on HN