Perhaps he should put his money where his mouth is: https://careers.airbnb.com/positions/ Because "US, except these states" isn’t exactly hiring "from anywhere".
Time zones and expected levels of education are still significant factors. You generally don't want to be hiring people from regions with a substandard education system - and if they're in another time zone they can spend all night ruining your day before you even start work.
Brian Chesky: Ability to hire from anywhere is more valuable than in-office work
31–40 of 185 posts
Re: Brian Chesky: Ability to hire from anywhere is more valuable than in-office work
#32Perhaps he should put his money where his mouth is: https://careers.airbnb.com/positions/ Because "US, except these states" isn’t exactly hiring "from anywhere".
On the flipside I've been able to convince companies to add a state before. I imagine it gets more difficult the larger the company is though, otherwise someone would have already added your state by that point.
Re: Brian Chesky: Ability to hire from anywhere is more valuable than in-office work
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not my experience in over a decade but I'm looking strictly for remote and don't bother with hybrid/onsite.
Mind sharing how you approach this?
Re: Brian Chesky: Ability to hire from anywhere is more valuable than in-office work
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not my experience in over a decade but I'm looking strictly for remote and don't bother with hybrid/onsite.
Mind sharing how you approach this?
Re: Brian Chesky: Ability to hire from anywhere is more valuable than in-office work
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> it reduces ones carbon footprint Is this proven (it probably can't be proven given the huge variety of commutes, office spaces, heating sources etc.)? It would be my default assumption but I feel like heating one office with 100 people in it is much more efficient than heating 100 homes in winter. And if people are in a location where publish transport is the norm then it might be better in terms of carbon impact…
But people will be heating their home in winter in any case, whether they're remote or on-site.
Re: Brian Chesky: Ability to hire from anywhere is more valuable than in-office work
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
But people will be heating their home in winter in any case, whether they're remote or on-site.
When I’m on-site, my house is set to a significantly lower temperature during the day. Scheduled thermostats have been around long enough that I assume that’s the norm.
Re: Brian Chesky: Ability to hire from anywhere is more valuable than in-office work
#37Yet, most IT work is on-site. At least in EU.
Re: Brian Chesky: Ability to hire from anywhere is more valuable than in-office work
#38Perhaps he should put his money where his mouth is: https://careers.airbnb.com/positions/ Because "US, except these states" isn’t exactly hiring "from anywhere".
Time zones and expected levels of education are still significant factors. You generally don't want to be hiring people from regions with a substandard education system - and if they're in another time zone they can spend all night ruining your day before you even start work.
Or they can be saving your service in emergency while you stay in bed. I'm not sure why you'd expect a different time zone to mean lower skills than yours.
Re: Brian Chesky: Ability to hire from anywhere is more valuable than in-office work
#39Re: Brian Chesky: Ability to hire from anywhere is more valuable than in-office work
#40Perhaps he should put his money where his mouth is: https://careers.airbnb.com/positions/ Because "US, except these states" isn’t exactly hiring "from anywhere".
It seems entirely reasonable to create state entities in a late-binding fashion, only after you find an employee or other reason requiring the creation of an entity and all the recurring paperwork/expense associated. (I am sightly surprised to see Delaware on the list given that I'm pretty sure they're originally registered as a Delaware corp.)