In the instructions, I'd also make it a bit more clear what does it take to win the game. Like "Keep adding words until all words are similar by more than 20%"
Kudos for building the game, I hope it gains some traction.
41–50 of 71 posts
In the instructions, I'd also make it a bit more clear what does it take to win the game. Like "Keep adding words until all words are similar by more than 20%"
Kudos for building the game, I hope it gains some traction.
I got ocean->radio My path: Ocean-> waves -> amplitude -> radio Solution path: Ocean -> air —> radio It seems odd that waves could be less closely related to radio than air. I wonder if there’s some homonym issue with wave or something like that? Edit: Similarly, I got a random puzzle: Heat -> Bar “Pressure” seams like it ought to be a good guess. But apparently Heat and pressure are 29% related (ok! Seems reasonable…
[0] https://www.tiktok.com/tag/gotitchallenge
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyx8iMKYrE8
[2] https://www.google.com/books/edition/American_Girl_s_Book/WO...
[3] https://www.google.com/books/edition/Les_jeux_d_esprit_ou_La...
I put waves for radio and ocean and got 19% and 55%. Is my expectation that the first percentage should be higher off?
I also had a random one:
Heat -> bar
I went with pressure, since it is related to heat obviously, and a bar is a unit of pressure. But it didn’t like the second one.
I wonder if there’s a homonym issue, or if I just don’t understand word embeddings.
I put waves for radio and ocean and got 19% and 55%. Is my expectation that the first percentage should be higher off?
I got ocean->radio My path: Ocean-> waves -> amplitude -> radio Solution path: Ocean -> air —> radio It seems odd that waves could be less closely related to radio than air. I wonder if there’s some homonym issue with wave or something like that? Edit: Similarly, I got a random puzzle: Heat -> Bar “Pressure” seams like it ought to be a good guess. But apparently Heat and pressure are 29% related (ok! Seems reasonable…
I got the same ocean->radio How is 'waves' not a qualifying word?
See also https://enlinko.com/ . The calculations here are snappy. I do not know which one was created first. "Relatedness" here is according to ... something ... Approximately but not exactly the likelyhood that words appear near to one another in a large corpus of text. Probably doing lookups on something crunched by google books.
Thanks for posting about Enlinko. I'm author of it, i've published it 24 days ago:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35630451
Domain for this game has been created 9 days ago. So, i think someone was heavily inspired by my idea.
I understand that anyone can make game with same idea, but i'm bit sad that Enlinko haven't got such traction on HN as this game.
As for relatedness, my game uses semantic vectors from this model https://github.com/commonsense/conceptnet-numberbatch
I'm author of https://enlinko.com/ game, published it 24 days ago:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35630451
Domain for this game has been created 9 days ago. So, i think someone was heavily inspired by my idea.
I understand that anyone can make game with same idea, but i'm bit sad that Enlinko haven't got such traction on HN as this game.
I got ocean->radio My path: Ocean-> waves -> amplitude -> radio Solution path: Ocean -> air —> radio It seems odd that waves could be less closely related to radio than air. I wonder if there’s some homonym issue with wave or something like that? Edit: Similarly, I got a random puzzle: Heat -> Bar “Pressure” seams like it ought to be a good guess. But apparently Heat and pressure are 29% related (ok! Seems reasonable…
I got ocean->radio My path: Ocean-> waves -> amplitude -> radio Solution path: Ocean -> air —> radio It seems odd that waves could be less closely related to radio than air. I wonder if there’s some homonym issue with wave or something like that? Edit: Similarly, I got a random puzzle: Heat -> Bar “Pressure” seams like it ought to be a good guess. But apparently Heat and pressure are 29% related (ok! Seems reasonable…
Same here. I just concluded that this is probably not that well implemented.