Live data from Hacker News

YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers

bleepingcomputer.com

411–420 of 1001 posts

Re: YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers

#411

> A YouTube spokesperson confirmed this experiment and said the company urges viewers to try YouTube Premium or allow ads on the platform. Cutting off users access unless they do something is not "urging."

> Cutting off users access unless they do something is not "urging."

The company urges all users to do that, it is also experimenting with doing more than urging. The description quoted was exactly accurate.

Re: YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers

#413

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I want a paid for video streaming service with the following: * No attachment to Google * Enough network effect / traction to be interesting * No predatory data collection and recommendation algorithms YouTube premium isn't that. So for now I use Newpipe and ad blockers. If they lock it down, hopefully there will be enough traction somewhere else to pick up where they left off.

What you want kinda exists in other hosting providers like Vimeo, but the economics is not pretty and most people don't want such a service ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28547578 ). What you missed in your requirement list is how much will you be willing to pay for the service you desire.

It could be a public service, but people don't like these either.

Re: YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers

#415

It's incredible how many people go "I was almost ready to give them money" whilst using Youtube all the time with an ad blocker. I know it, I was one of them for years. Just buy the subscription. You get the free trial for a month. Nothing changes, the money is not missed, but you actually pay for something you use a lot. The biggest benefit is not being subjected to ads anymore just by being next to family members w…

YouTube is by no means the primary reason I run my ad blocker. That it works on YouTube is a side bonus, mostly useful if I need to watch something in an incognito window or while I'm signed into my work account. I pay for Premium on my main account mostly to support the creators. (The good ones tend to do the Patreon thing, and I much prefer to chip in there given the choice, but not everyone on YT does that.)

Fully agree with you there. I can't use the internet without an ad blocker.

Re: YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers

#416

YouTube premium perfectly showcases why ads dominate the internet, because even when there is a paid option for a service much cheaper than any alternative, people do not want to pay (And I am not talking about too broke to pay cases). Serving an infinite video catalog is very expensive in terms of all resources (And yes Netflix is not comparable, unlike YouTube, Netflix can highly leverage cache boxes at ISPs). Vime…

> because even when there is a paid option for a service much cheaper than any alternative, people do not want to pay People don't want to pay for half-baked products: - Workspace accounts don't work - Even with standard accounts, it won't work on many devices (eg. TV apps), so you still get ads even as you paid - As Google regularly kills people's account, it also means most of us have multiple Youtube accounts that…

>Even with standard accounts, it won't work on many devices (eg. TV apps), so you still get ads even as you paid

I really don't think this is true. I can't think of any official YouTube app where this won't work - across mobile devices, smart TVs, streaming boxes/sticks, games consoles.

Re: YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers

#417

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> because even when there is a paid option for a service much cheaper than any alternative, people do not want to pay People don't want to pay for half-baked products: - Workspace accounts don't work - Even with standard accounts, it won't work on many devices (eg. TV apps), so you still get ads even as you paid - As Google regularly kills people's account, it also means most of us have multiple Youtube accounts that…

> People don't want to pay for half-baked products: This is disingenuous, to be blunt. People do not block youtube ads because workspace accounts don't work or because Google kills off niche products or that people lose youtube accounts when switching devices. Switching profiles is already considered an inconvenience, due to the way the algorithms tailor so well, regardless of how often you may engage in it.

The ad blocker problem is less people explicitely blocking ads on Youtube, than people blanket blocking ads everywhere. They'd need to white list Youtube to disable it for that specific case.

So the question is whether they really _want_ to pay for Premium or not, the ad-blocker will probably stay on either way.

> Switching profiles is already considered an inconvenience

I'm not following. For instance I have a work profile, my main profile on my phone (mostly due to paying for Google One + apps + a bunch of services on that specific account), and other profiles on my other devices (home laptop + ipad)

I absolutely do not want my work account to share my personal algorithmic recommendations, or my main account getting killed because of anything happening on other devices, including facturation issues.

Funnily enough, even as those accounts are separate, there's still cross-contamination of the algorithmic recomendations, probably because they share the same IP or geoloc.

Re: YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers

#418

Is it weird that this makes me want to subscribe to YouTube premium less than before? Feels like I've been poised to give them money for a while, since so many people seem to like the service. Now I feel like they're challenging me to a duel.

If you weren’t a paying customer, refuse to become a paying customer, and refuse to watch the ads, they don’t gain anything by having you as a user. It only costs them to retain you. If doing something as simple as asking you to hold up your end of the deal of using their website (letting ads load for the ad-supported content) is too much to ask but paying for the website is also too much to ask, you have to be hones…

[deleted]

Re: YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers

#419

YouTube premium perfectly showcases why ads dominate the internet, because even when there is a paid option for a service much cheaper than any alternative, people do not want to pay (And I am not talking about too broke to pay cases). Serving an infinite video catalog is very expensive in terms of all resources (And yes Netflix is not comparable, unlike YouTube, Netflix can highly leverage cache boxes at ISPs). Vime…

Not necessarily pure peer-to-peer, but I'm pretty sure some federated thing could absolutely work.

We just need this country/world to collectively remember what a library is.

Re: YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers

#420

It's incredible how many people go "I was almost ready to give them money" whilst using Youtube all the time with an ad blocker. I know it, I was one of them for years. Just buy the subscription. You get the free trial for a month. Nothing changes, the money is not missed, but you actually pay for something you use a lot. The biggest benefit is not being subjected to ads anymore just by being next to family members w…

Why? Does Google need to be making a higher profit than it already does? Does YouTube deserve the extra money? For what reason should we pay?

Need? No, not particularly. Deserve? Yes, they are providing a service.
Post reply on HN