Live data from Hacker News

Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

brave.com

371–380 of 494 posts

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#371
post #329
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

search.marginalia.nu consisted of 1 Swedish engineer and 1 server last I heard and still managed to outclass DDG in a number of query types relevant to me. In fact, back when I used DDG I think I fell back to marginalia more often than I fell back to Google, partly because of my dislike for Google and partly because Google doesn't respect my queries - which of course is a contributing reason for my dislike for them.…

All it takes is one good engineer and he can build anything. The difficult part is to get people to use it.

Brave already has access to a large pool of (from what I can see) enthusiastic users because of their browser : )

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#372
post #2

> Announcing the Brave Search API > In continuing our mission to offer alternatives to Big Tech, Brave is planning to release the Brave Search API. Through it, developers and companies will be able to build search experiences that compete on quality with Big Tech. Those interested should stay tuned for more details, or contact us at bizdev@brave.com. That's going to be very important for search engines like phind whi…

Perfect timing with Bing API increasing its pricing prohibitively!

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#373

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You mean in not caving to conservative-friendly "free speech" preferences? Its decision to downrank state-sponsored disinformation? One can question the wisdom of these decisions - but ultimately it's a matter of editorial control, not censorship.

> but ultimately it's a matter of editorial control, not censorship. So is all censorship. No censor calls censorship "Censorship". An example from my country of birth: Main Office of Control over the Press, Publications and Performances, since 1981 the Main Office of Control over Publications and Performances - the central office of state censorship in the Polish People's Republic. It was a censorship body (analogou…

> No censor calls censorship "Censorship".

The Catholic Church does. The office of Censor is still part of the official legislation (Can. 830 CIC).

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#374

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No I'm still solo developing. Would having a few more people working on it make stuff move faster? Undeniably. But I don't think lack of manpower is an obstacle at the moment in the same lack of hardware. It's reasonable to expect there's an upper limit to how big a project you can manage as a single developer, but I don't think I'm there yet.

I really wish there was someone reading this who could donate some hardware. I would love to but I am not in a position to do it, at least not right now.

I view it as a long march.

Right now I've got about two years runway, which isn't a lot but it also isn't nothing. Considering the project had barely started two years ago, and considering the opportunities it's already created, hopefully more options will make themselves available along the way somehow.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#375
post #306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Numerous times I’ve booked direct with the hotels and it’s cheaper than or same as 3rd party.

Booking.com requires the cheapest price, unless you are talking about the price from the hotel’s rewards program, which they will push very hard. It’s a contract loophole that works out for everyone except the non-savvy (or privacy-conscious) consumer.

> except the non-savvy (or privacy-conscious) consumer.

Every single hotel I have been to already requires your ID and records your information at check in. In fact, it is required by pretty much all city laws in the US.

I also would not want to stay in a hotel that does not require it.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#376
post #348

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This whole reply thread looks astroturfed.

I notice it every time when the benefit of booking 3rd party is questioned.

Having to walk a guest when the hotel cannot meet the terms of the reservation is part of the contract between the big hotel brands and franchisors. If the hotel operators do not fulfill the walk policy, then you should contact the 800 number for Marriott/Hilton/IHG/Choice/Wyndham/etc and they will mail you a check for your expenses and bill the hotel owner.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#377
post #244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Again that's the opposite of my experience. If I've booked on Booking.com my booking is right there, on their website and in my inbox. If I book directly with the hotel, do I have a booking? Uh, maybe. Roll of the dice when I show up.

I literally live in hotels for seven months a year across the US. I have never seen this happen. But I only stay at Hilton and Hyatt brand hotels.

Sticking with a single big corporate chain has most of the same advantages as using a big booking site. But I never found a single chain that had hotels everywhere I wanted to go; indeed a lot of the places I end up wanting to to don't have any name brand hotels at all.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#378
post #26

Just started testing Brave Search, and it scored a rare 100 on the first test: If you type in the name of a favorite boutique hotel, will you get that hotel's true website -- or the usual hairball of third-party intermediaries? (For anyone who's ever tried to modify a reservation, the difference is astonishing. If you're booked with the hotel, all kinds of adjustments are at least possible. If you're booked with Book…

> even DuckDuckGo

Why "even" when it's basically BingBingGo.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#379
post #367
post #307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If there were an alternative that didn't suck, I'd look at it. But 95% of first-party hotel websites suck massively. So what's the option? AirBNB is far worse than booking.com in the moral stakes. I guess picking one of the big hotel chains and going with them might work for some people, but no one chain has good enough coverage IME.

I typically use travel sites to search for hotels and read reviews, then just book directly with the hotel, which has never cost me more, and often less because some sites (i.e. booking) obfuscate the relationship between price and amenities/size so you don't get what you actually could get for the money if you just went to the hotel directly.

Life's too short to do direct hotel bookings. The sites are slow and terrible to navigate even when they're not straight-up broken. They never bother to tell you their cancellation policy, filling in your information is a drag and you don't get a proper calendar entry unless you make one manually.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#380
post #349
post #347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never heard of this and never had a hotel do it when they've fucked a booking.

When was the last time you booked direct with a hotel where they were overbooked and they refused to walk you to another hotel when you showed up? Which hotel is it? We can call them up to ask them to clarify their policy. Edit: Here's more information since you're not familiar with the walk policy. https://thepointsguy.com/guide/getting-walked-from-a-hotel-c... https://www.lawinsider.com/clause/walk-policy https://w…

Those are all about big corporate chains, which have many of the same advantages as something like booking.com. We were talking about boutique hotels. If you really want I can tell you the place in Aachen where it last happened to me and you can call them up, but I guarantee they don't have "policies", and probably not anyone who speaks English.
Post reply on HN