Ubuntu 23.04 – 'Lunar Lobster'
zdnet.com
Ubuntu 23.04 – 'Lunar Lobster'
1–10 of 62 posts
Re: Ubuntu 23.04 – 'Lunar Lobster'
#2Re: Ubuntu 23.04 – 'Lunar Lobster'
#3With 100% more snaps? No thanks.
Re: Ubuntu 23.04 – 'Lunar Lobster'
#4With 100% more snaps? No thanks.
Re: Ubuntu 23.04 – 'Lunar Lobster'
#5With 100% more snaps? No thanks.
What exactly is wrong with snaps?
Edit: I didn’t know about the new updates to snap and pinning. Thanks for the info!
Re: Ubuntu 23.04 – 'Lunar Lobster'
#6With 100% more snaps? No thanks.
What exactly is wrong with snaps?
- As a user: Snaps are annoying and don't work like a native app. It creates a new folder in my home directory, has little very consistency with other apps (even other packages of the same app), and feels generally unsuited for desktop use. If I'm going to use any of these godawful statically-linked-runtime package managers, it won't be the proprietary one.
- As an admin: Snaps are alright. If you just need to insta-configure something and are extremely lazy, it's a faustian deal pre-installed on every Ubuntu machine. As loathe as I am to admit it, most snaps are a cinch to install compared to native packaging or even Flatpak.
Re: Ubuntu 23.04 – 'Lunar Lobster'
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
What exactly is wrong with snaps?
It’s not possible to freeze a working configuration with snaps as they always auto-update. This is problematic for deploying software that has known working dependency versions. Edit: I didn’t know about the new updates to snap and pinning. Thanks for the info!
Re: Ubuntu 23.04 – 'Lunar Lobster'
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
What exactly is wrong with snaps?
It’s not possible to freeze a working configuration with snaps as they always auto-update. This is problematic for deploying software that has known working dependency versions. Edit: I didn’t know about the new updates to snap and pinning. Thanks for the info!