Earlier quoted context omitted.
And already now they force you to log in to an account to view NSFW content, unless you go to old.reddit.com.
When you can go to old.reddit.com to view it, they're not actually forcing anyone.
Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
161–170 of 476 posts
Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
#162Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
> old-reddit isn't mobile-engineered Eh. I exclusively use https://old.reddit.com/ on both Desktop and Mobile, and never felt inconvenienced. Our cell phones are large enough today to use 2008-era websites without any additional bells and whistles. But, of course, people who are already used to whatever UI they chose are going to suffer. Alas.
I also use old.reddit all the time but come on, you seriously can't mean it's a good mobile experience. The text is tiny and you need to zoom in and out all the time just to be able to read anything. It becomes exhausting reading a comment thread by all the zooming. The image posts also don't have the actual image embedded, which makes it a really bad experience on mobile when you have to go to another URL just to lo…
I've stopped using Reddit now. I liked the freedom of speech and the curiosity of the users. Freedom of speech had been eliminated totally. Curuisity can presumably be found in some niche subreddits - but even the niche subreddits I used to frequent have fallen.
Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
> old-reddit isn't mobile-engineered Eh. I exclusively use https://old.reddit.com/ on both Desktop and Mobile, and never felt inconvenienced. Our cell phones are large enough today to use 2008-era websites without any additional bells and whistles. But, of course, people who are already used to whatever UI they chose are going to suffer. Alas.
I also use old.reddit all the time but come on, you seriously can't mean it's a good mobile experience. The text is tiny and you need to zoom in and out all the time just to be able to read anything. It becomes exhausting reading a comment thread by all the zooming. The image posts also don't have the actual image embedded, which makes it a really bad experience on mobile when you have to go to another URL just to lo…
Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
#165Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't this the cardinal sin of an image host? They are partially killing links in a way that wasn't previously communicated. And to make it worse, it directly targets what was previously the primary strength of the site, easy and accountless uploads with only a few clicks. Why would anyone use them as an image host again? I wonder if they are hemorrhaging money. This decision gives the impression that they simply don…
>it directly targets what was previously the primary strength of the site, easy and accountless uploads with only a few clicks. I stopped using imgur several years ago precisely because I couldn't upload anything easily, account or no account. Mobile in particular couldn't upload period, the feature(?) simply wasn't even there. I've since moved on to using Discord, specifically a private "server" I made for the purpo…
I frequently use Imgur because of its built in support in various tools such as Greenshot.
Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
#167Makes sense. Not exactly advertising friendly content for them to monetize.
That's been true for the past 10 years. What's changed? edit: They sold to Medialab in 2021. That's what's changed.
Imgur stopped existing in 2021 and it became part of Medialab. (Medialab also own kik and whisper)
Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
#168That's the cause for these changes.
Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
#169The pendulum has clearly started to swing back to sexual repression. Society has started to see sexual freedom and expression as grotesque. Now the only question is how far it'll swing.
I think we live in an increasingly neo-victorian age. It's not just sex. It has become toxic to express a wide range of opinions. For example, the systematic deplatforming of conservatives. (I am a liberal, and my need to state that to be taken seriously is further evidence of all this.)
Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that's intentional. They clearly want to kill those apps because they don't generate ad revenue. Those apps will now also have to move to a subscription-only model because the APIs will be paid, as the Apollo dev confirmed.
I'm trying to take the most charitable interpretation possible instead of assuming malice on the part of reddit, but it's difficult to interpret it any other way than they have decided to kill 3rd party clients and not be upfront about their intentions. It wouldn't be so difficult to swallow if the official mobile app was high quality, but it isn't. There are major UX issues with the official app that haven't been fi…