Live data from Hacker News

Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content

imgurinc.com

141–150 of 476 posts

Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content

#141

The pendulum has clearly started to swing back to sexual repression. Society has started to see sexual freedom and expression as grotesque. Now the only question is how far it'll swing.

There's plenty of sexual progression online. Imgur's decision has little to do with society as a whole. It's one company wanting to get off the porn train so they look better to potential buyers.

Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content

#142
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Manufacture a consensus"?

A SFW way to say "manipulate opinion", I guess.

I think it's a adaptation of "Manufacturing Consent", to sound less rapey. But yes, it's a euphemism for manipulating other people's opinions.

Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content

#143
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't this the cardinal sin of an image host? They are partially killing links in a way that wasn't previously communicated. And to make it worse, it directly targets what was previously the primary strength of the site, easy and accountless uploads with only a few clicks. Why would anyone use them as an image host again? I wonder if they are hemorrhaging money. This decision gives the impression that they simply don…

If they want to monetize that old stuff, couldn't they just serve up an ad instead of an image for those ancient images, then display the full image if you visit the actual imgur page by deleting the .jpg extension? Or they could do what Facebook used to do (still does?), and put them on Blu-ray disk cold storage, then load them into one of those giant jukebox-esque machines that grabs the Blu-ray disk whenever someo…

TIL about FB Blu-ray disk cold storage. Thanks.

https://www.datacenterfrontier.com/cloud/article/11431537/in...

The blog post has a link to video from FB itself from 2014 and it has no audio. its not the first old FB video I came across that had no audio. Wonder if the cold storage has something to do with it.

https://web.facebook.com/Engineering/videos/1015212866009720...

Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content

#144

I wish imgur would go away entirely. It’s such a toxic community of people. If you are not aligned with their doctrine you get spammed with downvotes and some of the most hateful replies I’ve ever seen. You report it but it stays there.

The users on Imgur is incredibly protective of their little cornor of the internet, but as you point out also extremely toxic, making even Reddit look half-way decent. I wouldn't recommend Imgur, sure some of the images and comments are fun and lighthearted, overall though, it has become a dark place. The frontpage is overrun by US politics, everyone is depressed, have some sort of mental disorder or disability and work minimum wage jobs.

When Imgur was created I doubt that much thought went into why it's so difficult to build a good image hosting site. There's no profit in it. You need to add a social layer, or some other hook that make people stick around and watch ads. As storage and bandwidth has become cheaper, it makes sense that a site like Reddit just went ahead and did their own image hosting. Imgur has become disconnected and needs to find its own audience, which is has, it just so happens that their audience is terrible. 4chan looks downright cheerful compared to Imgur.

Maybe they managed to carve out a niche? One that could be profitable if they get rid of X amount of storage, hence deleting NSFW content and older anonymous uploads.

Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a problem on mobile, because old-reddit isn't mobile-engineered and there isn't uBlock for iOS. The go-to Reddit app for iOS is Apollo, and they're going to be affected. https://www.reddit.com/r/apolloapp/comments/12ram0f/had_a_fe...

> old-reddit isn't mobile-engineered Eh. I exclusively use https://old.reddit.com/ on both Desktop and Mobile, and never felt inconvenienced. Our cell phones are large enough today to use 2008-era websites without any additional bells and whistles. But, of course, people who are already used to whatever UI they chose are going to suffer. Alas.

I also use old.reddit all the time but come on, you seriously can't mean it's a good mobile experience. The text is tiny and you need to zoom in and out all the time just to be able to read anything. It becomes exhausting reading a comment thread by all the zooming. The image posts also don't have the actual image embedded, which makes it a really bad experience on mobile when you have to go to another URL just to look at it.

Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content

#146

At some point imgur built a front page. Initially it mirrored reddits front page. And then it diverged, and very strangely for an image hosting site, most of the content on the front page was text. Often about current events, engaging in a superficial way (so, falling into the traps that HN is set up to avoid) but sometimes just tweet screenshots. This i guess is another move away from image content for imgur. Dunno.

[dead]

Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content

#147
post #5

Tumblr 2.0 incoming? It's a not-so-unspoken fact that a lot of social media platforms are popular because they have tons of pornography. Reddit, Twitter, OnlyFans (more openly) and (until now) Imgur all have massive communities around explicit content. Even Twitch and YouTube are hugely successful as ways for OnlyFans creators to drive users to their explicit content. Going to be very interesting to see if imgur drop…

Reddit has also recently announced moves in regards to NSFW content[1] by limiting data access to mature content more aggressively than they currently do. It seems like an area a lot of platforms are struggling with and seem to opt for a complete ban. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/reddit/comments/12qwagm/an_update_r...

And already now they force you to log in to an account to view NSFW content, unless you go to old.reddit.com.

Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit has also recently announced moves in regards to NSFW content[1] by limiting data access to mature content more aggressively than they currently do. It seems like an area a lot of platforms are struggling with and seem to opt for a complete ban. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/reddit/comments/12qwagm/an_update_r...

And already now they force you to log in to an account to view NSFW content, unless you go to old.reddit.com.

When you can go to old.reddit.com to view it, they're not actually forcing anyone.

Re: Imgur Updates TOS, Banning NSFW Content

#150

I wish imgur would go away entirely. It’s such a toxic community of people. If you are not aligned with their doctrine you get spammed with downvotes and some of the most hateful replies I’ve ever seen. You report it but it stays there.

I'll never understand people who actively use Imgur as if it's a social network.
Post reply on HN