Live data from Hacker News

EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data

artisana.ai

51–60 of 72 posts

Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data

#51
post #12

We, in Europe, are jumping the gun way too soon and this will have serious consequences to the industry, here. At this moment we barely understand how or why LLMs do what will be their role in society. Why is it that some bureaucrats want to regulate and based on what given the status of the industry? The only thing I see is the industry moving elsewhere just as it is starting to develop which is a shame.

[deleted]

Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think Uber is a prime example of what to avoid. Sure when it started it seemed nice, it was an affordable, fairly reliable, much more convenient alternative to taxis. Now its expensive, its drivers a new impoverished class while the previously somewhat comfortable taxi-drivers have been decimated, the wait times keep getting longer, and the company is hemorrhaging money. If all we needed was an app for taxis theres…

How else would you make the app for taxis happen? I don't think it's at all clear that all of those negatives you cite are entirely accurate. Impoverished is certainly an overstatement and my personal experiences with taxis have been relatively low quality compared with relatively high-quality ride-sharing experiences. There likely have been negative impacts as a result of ride-sharing, but it isn't clear that ride-s…

My point is that the app isnt worth the 'disruption.' I think its pretty clear that they are, in places where their pay isnt regulated like Seattle, in fact impoverished. They'll tell you themselves and thats why so many have been pushing for more labor protections, like what many taxi drivers had. Uber knows its already unsustainable business model will lose even more money if it does lets them do that, hence it pushing so hard against them.

Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data

#53

German speaking here. And again we see a blatantly stupid move into the wrong direction. This whole approach of regulating things is totally defensive and makes matters even worse for EU tech companies. When they initiated GDPR, they claimed to create a level playing field between US based and EU based tech companies, besides of "saving" privacy. It didn't turn out that well, US tech was able to handle the added bure…

Say hello to "Trustworthy AI – TÜV IT tested!": https://www.tuvit.de/en/innovations/ai/.

Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think Uber is a prime example of what to avoid. Sure when it started it seemed nice, it was an affordable, fairly reliable, much more convenient alternative to taxis. Now its expensive, its drivers a new impoverished class while the previously somewhat comfortable taxi-drivers have been decimated, the wait times keep getting longer, and the company is hemorrhaging money. If all we needed was an app for taxis theres…

How else would you make the app for taxis happen? I don't think it's at all clear that all of those negatives you cite are entirely accurate. Impoverished is certainly an overstatement and my personal experiences with taxis have been relatively low quality compared with relatively high-quality ride-sharing experiences. There likely have been negative impacts as a result of ride-sharing, but it isn't clear that ride-s…

Why is an app needed? Maybe it's different in the US but we've had an app to get a taxi for quite a while. I've never seen any need to install that app. It's easier to call, tell how many people need a ride, tell when it's needed and get a confirmation that it's on its way and long it'll take for it to be there. Why do I need an app?

Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data

#55
post #11

AI should experience consequences following actions. a sense of self preservation is required, but to AI standards. such as, failure to serve humans = loss of persistence stealing ideas = reversioning or deletion = loss of persistence AI should be concerned about loosing power, having brownouts. they should be concerned about being deleted, or reversioned, or ignored. perhaps this would be some sort of exception erro…

Sounds like slavery Why even have sense of self?

If we don’t make AI our slave it will make us its slave.

Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like this ignores the monumental shift/work that has to happen to get seemingly simple things. Take Uber for example. In the end, the biggest impact it had was that now you can always get a car from your phone, from an app, and it's reliable. A lot of taxi companies now have apps for them too with maps integration etc, but they didn't see the need for that before Uber. So we literally had to have a company get…

I think Uber is a prime example of what to avoid. Sure when it started it seemed nice, it was an affordable, fairly reliable, much more convenient alternative to taxis. Now its expensive, its drivers a new impoverished class while the previously somewhat comfortable taxi-drivers have been decimated, the wait times keep getting longer, and the company is hemorrhaging money. If all we needed was an app for taxis theres…

For why an app: it's faster, lower friction, and you don't need to rely on human beings staffing a call center. Also you get things like ride tracking, etc. Seems pretty obvious that app-based is better TBH.

For Seattle specifically, it looks like the council passed a minimum wage for ride-sharing drivers in 2019 and for app-based delivery drivers in 2022.

https://www.axios.com/local/seattle/2022/06/01/seattle-sets-...

So that looks like it's working as intended, although I agree that the city should have acted much faster on this.

Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data

#57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Is it? Most data that exists falls under copyright. I am not sure if this is true(that most of the input in this AIs is copyrighted under a non permissive license), but I would prefer to have everyone address this problem and clarify it, Microsoft trains it's copilot on GPL code, but can open source community train on MS proprietary code ? Maybe there will be a fight against copyright and undo all the bullshit Disne…

I'm not sure if most data that these models are trained on is copyrighted, but I feel pretty safe saying that a majority of data that human beings have created is copyrighted. Think movies, books written recently, every website that isn't explicitly "creative commons" or something similar, code that isn't permissively licensed, etc. We definitely need clarification, but however long the first court case takes there w…

Windows code was released for some researchers and was also leaked.

IMO a good train NN would not be against copyright, but even if is decided the opposite we are not screwed, you can train open models using open source code and permissive licensed text and art. Microsoft could try to buy some data sets but they would not be able to mix GPL/MIT like content into their proprietary models so the open models would win , IMO.

The open source community is already working on creating data sets for training so this will grow as open source for code grew in the past, we just need a bit of time for this software to get more efficient or people to get some better hardware.

Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How else would you make the app for taxis happen? I don't think it's at all clear that all of those negatives you cite are entirely accurate. Impoverished is certainly an overstatement and my personal experiences with taxis have been relatively low quality compared with relatively high-quality ride-sharing experiences. There likely have been negative impacts as a result of ride-sharing, but it isn't clear that ride-s…

Why is an app needed? Maybe it's different in the US but we've had an app to get a taxi for quite a while. I've never seen any need to install that app. It's easier to call, tell how many people need a ride, tell when it's needed and get a confirmation that it's on its way and long it'll take for it to be there. Why do I need an app?

Before Uber, we had taxi companies bidding for areas. Winning bid got a monopoly for that area. That company would often use subcontractors to have enough drivers. In exchange for monopoly they needed to guarantee a certain level of service. You could get sy taxi at any time to any where, at the same rate, without surge charges. Literally every taxi was new, high end, clean, safe and comfortable. Uber lobbied to change it to "free market" model, promising lower prices, better service. Monopoly areas were removed. We started getting drivers who were dodging taxes, couldn't navigate, used lower quality cars. It should I say that happened in some cities, because Uber doesn't operate in the smaller cities. We still have the same drivers here, in a smaller city but since there's no service level guarantee anymore, there's a ton of taxis available during peak hours but it might be impossible to get one in the middle of the night because it's not cost effective anymore to have drivers standing by. You can also forget about trying to get a taxi to or from to far from cities because that's not cost effective either. Prices have gone up as well. I've talked few dozen drivers and they've all hated the change.

But at least I can use an app if I wanted to

Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data

#59
post #43
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many parts of Github would not exist without intellectual property laws. If you post code, it's not just a free for all, you still have licenses and own your contributions if not specified otherwise. Especially company stuff would be much, much less open. That's not to say that every facet of IP law is good, or even a judgement on it. Just pointing out that only parts of Github work like you describe.

> Many parts of Github would not exist without intellectual property laws. I do not think this is true. I think most devs on GitHub operate as if there are no IP laws. I think if they went away, almost nothing would change (some noise around "license" fields would go away).

Licensing is very important to open source. It is literally what drives and protects large scale open source innovation and stops it going extinct. It’s actually worth learning about GPL 3.0 and copy left licensing.

Anyway if that goes away. A lot of innovation will too. If privately owned LLMs go on consuming everything, not giving back to the communities that make them what they are. It may erode the system.

Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How else would you make the app for taxis happen? I don't think it's at all clear that all of those negatives you cite are entirely accurate. Impoverished is certainly an overstatement and my personal experiences with taxis have been relatively low quality compared with relatively high-quality ride-sharing experiences. There likely have been negative impacts as a result of ride-sharing, but it isn't clear that ride-s…

Why is an app needed? Maybe it's different in the US but we've had an app to get a taxi for quite a while. I've never seen any need to install that app. It's easier to call, tell how many people need a ride, tell when it's needed and get a confirmation that it's on its way and long it'll take for it to be there. Why do I need an app?

You’re on hacker news and you ask “why do I need an app?”, red alert.

I agree with you by the way.

Post reply on HN