Live data from Hacker News

Joe Rogan Issues Warning After AI-Generated Version of His Podcast Surfaces

zerohedge.com

171–180 of 181 posts

Re: Joe Rogan Issues Warning After AI-Generated Version of His Podcast Surfaces

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is also how swatting works: https://www.vice.com/en/article/k7z8be/torswats-computer-gen...

I don't understand how the phone systems allow for anonymous phone calls. Is it because of virtual telephone services? It feels like they should be required by law to follow KYC regulations like banks do.

And there should be a 5c tax on every phone call made

Re: Joe Rogan Issues Warning After AI-Generated Version of His Podcast Surfaces

#172
post #161

The one thing that I want from all this AI voice stuff is better selection of voice for the siris and alexas out there. i.e. Ability to clone some's voice onto an assistant Some voices are just more pleasant than others & it differs by person doing the listening

We know you want the Trump voice.

Also not just voice synthesis, but the word output should also be modeled after the character. E.g., [alarm 7:30] -> "It's 7:30, wake up you stupid son of a bitch!"

Re: Joe Rogan Issues Warning After AI-Generated Version of His Podcast Surfaces

#173

Fantastic execution. The generating dialogue I understand; how did they get the voices so incredibly lifelike?! Where do I start when I want text to speech like this?!

I never would have guessed computers writing code would come before generating convincing voices.

Moravec's Paradox at it again! The thing that I find really interesting is that a few years ago, generating a realistic facsimile of someone's voice was "something a computer could never do" but now I find LLMs' ability to generate believable dialogue more impressive than the (very good) text-to-speech conversion.

Re: Joe Rogan Issues Warning After AI-Generated Version of His Podcast Surfaces

#175

Personally I love this new AI voice content booms. My favorite is the AI presidents discussing/playing/rating stuff [1], Attenborough narrating warhammer [2]. While slightly silly, I think in future people might start to take internet way less serious when you can literally make things up. Which I think is a good trend. People getting depressed or so consumed by the internet culture that they loose all interest in th…

Don't forget the beach that makes you old and getting ratatouilled:

https://youtu.be/etaA94eM2AE

https://youtu.be/we1I6nK6OBg

Re: Joe Rogan Issues Warning After AI-Generated Version of His Podcast Surfaces

#176
post #172
post #161

The one thing that I want from all this AI voice stuff is better selection of voice for the siris and alexas out there. i.e. Ability to clone some's voice onto an assistant Some voices are just more pleasant than others & it differs by person doing the listening

We know you want the Trump voice. Also not just voice synthesis, but the word output should also be modeled after the character. E.g., [alarm 7:30] -> "It's 7:30, wake up you stupid son of a bitch!"

Can't wait for my assistant to tell me he's a great assistant, possibly the best in the world.

Re: Joe Rogan Issues Warning After AI-Generated Version of His Podcast Surfaces

#177

Personally I love this new AI voice content booms. My favorite is the AI presidents discussing/playing/rating stuff [1], Attenborough narrating warhammer [2]. While slightly silly, I think in future people might start to take internet way less serious when you can literally make things up. Which I think is a good trend. People getting depressed or so consumed by the internet culture that they loose all interest in th…

> While slightly silly, I think in future people might start to take internet way less serious when you can literally make things up.

The would be great. Finally a return to the old ways.

"I have read about it on the internet" was a meme for a reason...

Re: Joe Rogan Issues Warning After AI-Generated Version of His Podcast Surfaces

#178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> a more local, trust-less internet like we had in the 90s and early 00s I don't recognize this description of the Internet from any time after 1985 onward.

"More local" may not be the perfect description. When I wrote it I was thinking of things like AIM where, for the most part, you knew everyone you were interacting with. The more I think about it, there were plenty of chatrooms and forums at that time though, so yeah, probably not a good word to use. I think "trust-less" is more what I'm getting at though. In the 90s and early 00s the whole, "don't reveal anything pe…

Yes I remember when a local direct connect hub had a LAN party and many people met IRL for the first time. I continued to meet these people in later years in normal life even after the hub was shutdown. That was semi closed and people were generally trustworthy.

Re: Joe Rogan Issues Warning After AI-Generated Version of His Podcast Surfaces

#179
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> a more local, trust-less internet like we had in the 90s and early 00s I don't recognize this description of the Internet from any time after 1985 onward.

This might just be a way of aging ourselves. I do feel that Facebook blatantly flipped the norm that you used a pseudonym and kept personal information private when communicating (much less publishing) online - that's the norm I grew up with in the 90s and even the early 00s.

And it was only so they could target you with ads or so your friends could find and add you so they could target them with ads

Re: Joe Rogan Issues Warning After AI-Generated Version of His Podcast Surfaces

#180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I think in future people might start to take internet way less serious when you can literally make things up I've been starting to think this way as well. It feels like we're seeing something similar to the way that mass spam calls drastically changed the way people use the phones to the point where people don't recognize a phone number, they just don't pick up anymore. As the ratio of garbage goes up, people will…

Trust-less information was the norm for most of history. The past century has really been an anomaly when it came to trusting news, with photos and videos seeming to be reliable proof. Before that, societies had to be structured very differently to account for the lack of proof. You'd hear people from out of town talking about what they saw in a neighboring city. You'd need to judge how trustworthy the person was. Pe…

But how do you know the tiktok you're watching of your favorite opinion affirmer hasn't been AI generated to impersonate them?
Post reply on HN