Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Bing app isn't as responsive as ChatGPT. I asked it a slightly question about my taxes and it "binged" something weird and gave me a non-answer generic response.
I’ve noticed that bing chat is better if you instruct it not to search anything, that way it will use the model knowledge. I’ve learned to use the model knowledge or the web search results summary depending on what I want. But ChatGPT is still way better for model knowledge because it has fewer restrictions. I wish they would make this distinction clearer in the UI. Most of the time it can answer without resorting to…
Personal Concierge Using OpenAI's ChatGPT via Telegram and Voice Messages
61–70 of 102 posts
Re: Personal Concierge Using OpenAI's ChatGPT via Telegram and Voice Messages
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a personal AI assistant to act as a second brain, and help me prioritize and remember things with human intuition Everyone wants this, but this is not the product. The current AI offerings are information in --> information out. It is not meant to keep state long term, and it is not meant to be your friend. It is meant to answer questions with the information available to it. You can even see in the example screens…
That's just the case for this bot, but is obviously not the case for ChatGPT. I have a long running conversation with ChatGPT that I use to keep track of a verbal to-do list. I tell it my items with categories (e.g. work, personal, etc.) and estimated times, and then it outputs my complete task list, grouped by category. I then just tell it when I add tasks or complete tasks, and it continually keeps track of and out…
Re: Personal Concierge Using OpenAI's ChatGPT via Telegram and Voice Messages
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
People continue to push this, without reading the privacy statements regarding API use. https://openai.com/policies/api-data-usage-policies https://openai.com/blog/introducing-chatgpt-and-whisper-apis
Even if you accept their pinky promise, won't people seeing others people's conversations just a few weeks ago?
Re: Personal Concierge Using OpenAI's ChatGPT via Telegram and Voice Messages
#64Great work! Thanks for taking the time to build this and open sourcing it. For me, it scratches on a very real itch. I’ve toyed with the idea of a personal AI assistant to act as a second brain, and help me prioritize and remember things with human intuition (“you can’t afford to delay X, do X today and maybe reach out to Z to set the expectations for delaying Y?”). To me, the greatest strength of LLMs is not their k…
GPT4 is so much better than 3.5 at virtually everything that I don't think it's worth trying to figure out which ones 3.5 is almost adequate enough for. Also, the pricing is per token, so even with 4 it is close to negligible unless you are loading in a lot of context or your conversation gets very long.
Re: Personal Concierge Using OpenAI's ChatGPT via Telegram and Voice Messages
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's just the case for this bot, but is obviously not the case for ChatGPT. I have a long running conversation with ChatGPT that I use to keep track of a verbal to-do list. I tell it my items with categories (e.g. work, personal, etc.) and estimated times, and then it outputs my complete task list, grouped by category. I then just tell it when I add tasks or complete tasks, and it continually keeps track of and out…
And what happens when your window runs out? It prunes the oldest convo which you will need to keep track. Likely it could be fine, but if there was a task from a long time ago, that could get wiped out
Re: Personal Concierge Using OpenAI's ChatGPT via Telegram and Voice Messages
#66This is the new hello world. https://github.com/danneu/telegram-chatgpt-bot https://t.me/god_in_a_bot (demo bot) I tried building this for WhatsApp but Twilio is weirdly expensive. I don't even think Twilio is cheap for sending 2FA tokens.
Re: Personal Concierge Using OpenAI's ChatGPT via Telegram and Voice Messages
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
The real problem with 4 is that OpenAI are having trouble keeping up with the demand. So it might not be an option until 4 turbo comes out in 37 hours or whatever their development cycle is these days.
Yea, I find it a fair bit annoying that I pay $20 and have a 25 message cap every 3 hours.
Re: Personal Concierge Using OpenAI's ChatGPT via Telegram and Voice Messages
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's just the case for this bot, but is obviously not the case for ChatGPT. I have a long running conversation with ChatGPT that I use to keep track of a verbal to-do list. I tell it my items with categories (e.g. work, personal, etc.) and estimated times, and then it outputs my complete task list, grouped by category. I then just tell it when I add tasks or complete tasks, and it continually keeps track of and out…
And what happens when your window runs out? It prunes the oldest convo which you will need to keep track. Likely it could be fine, but if there was a task from a long time ago, that could get wiped out
Here's where I posted a snippet of this convo a couple weeks ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35390644
Re: Personal Concierge Using OpenAI's ChatGPT via Telegram and Voice Messages
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh dang, that sounds awesome. So a ChatGPT conversation doesn't have a historical limit? I guess I assumed it would start having to forget things at a certain point.
If it periodically outputs the latest state of the todo list, it won't have the problem of forgetting things from a long time ago.
Re: Personal Concierge Using OpenAI's ChatGPT via Telegram and Voice Messages
#70Great work! Thanks for taking the time to build this and open sourcing it. For me, it scratches on a very real itch. I’ve toyed with the idea of a personal AI assistant to act as a second brain, and help me prioritize and remember things with human intuition (“you can’t afford to delay X, do X today and maybe reach out to Z to set the expectations for delaying Y?”). To me, the greatest strength of LLMs is not their k…
GPT4 is so much better than 3.5 at virtually everything that I don't think it's worth trying to figure out which ones 3.5 is almost adequate enough for. Also, the pricing is per token, so even with 4 it is close to negligible unless you are loading in a lot of context or your conversation gets very long.