Earlier quoted context omitted.
What does China actually stand to gain by invading Taiwan? Any kind of real analysis based in anything other than nationalistic fervor or fear mongering seems to indicate that they're better served by the status quo.
This is the wrong question. The right question is: what does the leader of china gain by ordering an invasion of Taiwan?
China plans to ban exports of rare earth magnet tech
121–130 of 611 posts
Re: China plans to ban exports of rare earth magnet tech
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
In a world without internet, your paper wallet will be worth ~as much as my D&D character's inventory sheet. And probably less, because at least the character sheet is big enough that I can make a paper airplane out of it.
Why's that?
Re: China plans to ban exports of rare earth magnet tech
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is not normal decoupling, we're in a full on economic war. In the short term that's terrible. In the long term, pain now will help minimize pain later when China invade Taiwan and US-China trade drops to zero overnight. It's coming sooner or later and the longer you leave your investments in China the more you risk the door slamming shut on your hand.
What does China actually stand to gain by invading Taiwan? Any kind of real analysis based in anything other than nationalistic fervor or fear mongering seems to indicate that they're better served by the status quo.
As an East Asian myself, the amount of stupidity that goes on in all of the East Asian countries at all levels because of “face” is astounding.
Call it “honor” or “nationalism” or “XXX Pride” - ultimately all the same thing.
Re: China plans to ban exports of rare earth magnet tech
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the US, the people can force change through protests and elections. What options do the Uyghurs or Chinese people have?
Do you want a real answer to this, or one that self-congratulates us, by playing to our biases and cultural myths, and generally poor understanding of how societies work? The same options that any people have. Soft power. Every government, be it formally representative or not, multi-party or dual-party, or single-party is ultimately only able to govern with the consent of the governed. There are always levers for peo…
Re: China plans to ban exports of rare earth magnet tech
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Pacific, for one, meaning control of shipping lanes—and with these, economic/political leverage over Japan (which, as internal PLA documents for senior staff have already revealed, they intend to put to full use). Right now, China is boxed in from all sides by mostly U.S. allied countries, so breaking the "First Island Chain" encirclement is in reality a much bigger deal than the semiconductor industry, especiall…
Who do they plan to ship to using their newly-conquered shipping lanes, exactly? They will find that the rest of the civilized world can say "No" to China, just as it has to Russia.
Umm...except for US+EU, no one is saying No to Russian oil and other exports. Of-course, you are free to consider that the "rest of the civilized world" in your mind.
Re: China plans to ban exports of rare earth magnet tech
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
What does China actually stand to gain by invading Taiwan? Any kind of real analysis based in anything other than nationalistic fervor or fear mongering seems to indicate that they're better served by the status quo.
They have always considered Taiwan part of China. The US even agreed and signed a treaty regarding that. The United States' One-China policy was first stated in the Shanghai Communiqué of 1972: "the United States acknowledges that Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. Since then, the US devolved first to strategic ambiguity and then recently to…
We have no political control in Cuba even though we did take a portion of the island.
Re: China plans to ban exports of rare earth magnet tech
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
Only the US, after all, is allowed to militarize the South China sea.
> the US, after all, is allowed to militarize the South China sea The U.S. doesn’t claim the sea as its sovereign waters. China does. (Which had the totally unpredictable effect of majorly pissing off every one of its maritime neighbours.)
Re: China plans to ban exports of rare earth magnet tech
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is not normal decoupling, we're in a full on economic war. In the short term that's terrible. In the long term, pain now will help minimize pain later when China invade Taiwan and US-China trade drops to zero overnight. It's coming sooner or later and the longer you leave your investments in China the more you risk the door slamming shut on your hand.
What does China actually stand to gain by invading Taiwan? Any kind of real analysis based in anything other than nationalistic fervor or fear mongering seems to indicate that they're better served by the status quo.
Sure there are geopolitical reasons as well, but The CCP very much does not want the living proof that they are not necessary to be sitting 100 miles off their coast.
If there were ever a real democratic movement in China it would draw huge cultural inspiration from Taiwan.
Re: China plans to ban exports of rare earth magnet tech
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
Only the US, after all, is allowed to militarize the South China sea.
> the US, after all, is allowed to militarize the South China sea The U.S. doesn’t claim the sea as its sovereign waters. China does. (Which had the totally unpredictable effect of majorly pissing off every one of its maritime neighbours.)
Re: China plans to ban exports of rare earth magnet tech
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
>"The West learned a lot during the first cold war and will outlast." During the CWI (ha I just coined the new Cold War I term) we did not get hi-tech stuff from the opponent. In CWII we are not that lucky and have no immediate replacement for many things. I am afraid if this thing really gets up to speed we a heading for disaster. That the other side suffers as well or even worse is no consolation.
What high tech stuff do we get from China?