Reduction of iron ore with carbon monoxid in closed loop: • Decarbonisation of BF-BOF through thermochemical closed carbon looping. • Demonstration of mass and energy flows of thermochemical BF-BOF system. • 88% emissions reduction of UK steel industry through £720 million investment. • Decarbonisation without retiring of existing BF-BOF, reducing stranded assets. • After 5 years, £1.28 billion savings and total UK-w…
The UK steel industry is 0.1% of the UK economy, at around 7 million tonnes per annum. China producuces a little over 1 billion metric tonnes per annum By what measure is this not futile?
Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to Green Steel
41–50 of 86 posts
Re: Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to Green Steel
#42Lots of refs here to the Haber-Bosch process in creating the ammonia... for those interested in a break down of what it is - https://www.carbonbrief.org/qa-what-does-the-worlds-reliance... ...sort of feels like kicking the can down the road if this is how the ammonia is generated for "Green Steel".
" Currently, ammonia is synthesized through the Haber–Bosch process by converting hydrogen and nitrogen into ammonia. In this process, hydrogen is mainly produced via steam methane reforming. This fact makes the process of fossil-fuel-based ammonia synthesis very carbon dioxide intensive, accounting for ≈1% of the global carbon dioxide emissions.[11, 16] Yet more sustainable ammonia synthesis pathways are under development to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions in the ammonia industry.[11, 16] For instance, the electrically driven hybrid Haber–Bosch process (via replacing the steam methane reforming by water electrolysis to obtain green hydrogen and coupling with an ammonia synthesis reactor in the Haber–Bosch process) or direct electrosynthesis using renewable energy (via nitrogen reduction reaction) enables the production of green ammonia.[11, 16] "
Not sure how that is kicking the can.
Re: Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to Green Steel
#43I think a much better is done by Boston Metal: https://www.bostonmetal.com/ Based on this paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12134
Re: Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to Green Steel
#44Reduction of iron ore with carbon monoxid in closed loop: • Decarbonisation of BF-BOF through thermochemical closed carbon looping. • Demonstration of mass and energy flows of thermochemical BF-BOF system. • 88% emissions reduction of UK steel industry through £720 million investment. • Decarbonisation without retiring of existing BF-BOF, reducing stranded assets. • After 5 years, £1.28 billion savings and total UK-w…
The UK steel industry is 0.1% of the UK economy, at around 7 million tonnes per annum. China producuces a little over 1 billion metric tonnes per annum By what measure is this not futile?
Re: Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to Green Steel
#45Lots of refs here to the Haber-Bosch process in creating the ammonia... for those interested in a break down of what it is - https://www.carbonbrief.org/qa-what-does-the-worlds-reliance... ...sort of feels like kicking the can down the road if this is how the ammonia is generated for "Green Steel".
From article: " Currently, ammonia is synthesized through the Haber–Bosch process by converting hydrogen and nitrogen into ammonia. In this process, hydrogen is mainly produced via steam methane reforming. This fact makes the process of fossil-fuel-based ammonia synthesis very carbon dioxide intensive, accounting for ≈1% of the global carbon dioxide emissions.[11, 16] Yet more sustainable ammonia synthesis pathways a…
Re: Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to Green Steel
#46Not in the financial sense of the word.
Re: Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to Green Steel
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
i think the question is how far you are shipping the hydrogen. If, say, people are making hydrogen in (say) the Middle East and shipping it to (say) Europe then the overhead of liquifying or compressing H2 is on the same order as converting to ammonia. In that paper they demonstrate that you can just use the ammonia directly to reduce iron and not have a separate system to convert it back. If you have a big wind powe…
I think it's more rational to ship the hydrogen as methane, rather than ammonia. The energetics are comparable IIRC (Sabatier for methane, Haber-Bosch for ammonia, but it's more or less the same kind of high-pressure moderate-temp chemistry pipeline). Methane from CO2 + H2 vs. ammonia from N2 + H2, it's just that the latter technology has seen more research and investment.
Re: Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to Green Steel
#48Lots of refs here to the Haber-Bosch process in creating the ammonia... for those interested in a break down of what it is - https://www.carbonbrief.org/qa-what-does-the-worlds-reliance... ...sort of feels like kicking the can down the road if this is how the ammonia is generated for "Green Steel".
Re: Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to Green Steel
#49Re: Reducing Iron Oxide with Ammonia: A Sustainable Path to Green Steel
#50I don’t get this. We already use direct reduction using about half hydrogen, and that can be increased to over 90%. Producing ammonia via the Haber process means losing 40% or so of the energy (and potentially more as you convert it back), so why not just use hydrogen directly? Simply because moving hydrogen is harder than ammonia? I think it makes way more sense to just make and use the hydrogen on-site.
You said it: transporting, storing, and otherwise handling ammonia is easier than H2. Amd handling a lump of coke is even easier, which is why we started there.