Although I have enjoyed listening to the Future Of Life podcasts for a few years, I think this public letter is not necessary. I do respect the signatories I recognize on the letter and I welcome listening to them, I think that we are so many years away from any of real AI that this is, as Andrew Ng has joked, like worrying about over population on Mars colonies. I have been heavily using GPT models for about 14 mont…
Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
51–60 of 1001 posts
Re: Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
#52[flagged]
I disagree with the letter and I think these fears are overblown, but the attitude on display here is pretty unpleasant.
Re: Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
#53What happens to the service economy and the political stability when the middle class paper pushed get decimated.
Re: Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
#54Funny to see someone call for wide scale cooperation to stop training LLMs but can't seem to get people to cooperate on the embargo.
Re: Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
#55[flagged]
I don't think laughing at people for their concerns is helpful. Especially when you don't seem to be bothered by the possibility that this is a civilization-ending development. For the record, I don't think it is, personally. But people are terrified, and not taking their fear seriously and dealing with it compassionately is a recipe for serious, and unnecessary disaster.
A job-ending development for many people, yes.
The chattering classes see themselves becoming obsolete. Fast. They're freaking out. From professors of English literature to op-ed writers, word slingers are in trouble. Not novelists, though; none of these systems can hold a story together for any great length.
If everything you get paid for goes in and out over a wire, you're in trouble.
Re: Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
#56Re: Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think laughing at people for their concerns is helpful. Especially when you don't seem to be bothered by the possibility that this is a civilization-ending development. For the record, I don't think it is, personally. But people are terrified, and not taking their fear seriously and dealing with it compassionately is a recipe for serious, and unnecessary disaster.
A civilization-ending development, no. A job-ending development for many people, yes. The chattering classes see themselves becoming obsolete. Fast. They're freaking out. From professors of English literature to op-ed writers, word slingers are in trouble. Not novelists, though; none of these systems can hold a story together for any great length. If everything you get paid for goes in and out over a wire, you're in…
Re: Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
#58GPT-4 might be close to the best we'll get on the general LLM model front for a while since they trained on a huge chunk of web text. Next real advances will probably be in tuning them for specific applications in medicine, law, accounting, marketing, coding and etc. As someone running a one man company I can't wait for the cost of accounting, legal and copywriting to approach 0. Cost of shipping products will also g…
Re: Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
#59That's a remarkable list of signatories.
Re: Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
#60Although I have enjoyed listening to the Future Of Life podcasts for a few years, I think this public letter is not necessary. I do respect the signatories I recognize on the letter and I welcome listening to them, I think that we are so many years away from any of real AI that this is, as Andrew Ng has joked, like worrying about over population on Mars colonies. I have been heavily using GPT models for about 14 mont…