There is no way that matches reality, where does the person publishing such a chart even live? Do they buy eggs or pay rent? Here is a real alternative - John William's shadow stats. He simply measures inflation as the government used to in the 80s and 70s, and surprise surprise its more like 10% or 14% - no phony "Owner's equivalent rent". http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts
I don’t understand how anyone who knows about basic compound growth can take this seriously.
10% annual inflation from 1970 would mean prices have increased by 150X since 1970.
That would mean houses would have cost a couple thousand dollars and a dozen eggs would have been about four cents.
And that’s only using the lower 10% estimate, not the higher 14% estimate. It’s obviously not even close to reality.
It’s a quack website that can’t even hold up to the most basic scrutiny.