Live data from Hacker News

FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

fdic.gov

271–280 of 1001 posts

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#271
post #194
post #2

Oldie but goodie on what actually happens when a bank is taken over. https://www.npr.org/2009/03/26/102384657/anatomy-of-a-bank-t...

From the looks of the news stories, it looks like the FDIC isn't as efficient in taking over a bank as it used to be: https://nypost.com/2023/03/10/nypd-called-to-silicon-valley-...

I wonder if the FDIC is just as efficient but this situation is different.

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#272
post #2

Oldie but goodie on what actually happens when a bank is taken over. https://www.npr.org/2009/03/26/102384657/anatomy-of-a-bank-t...

will companies with money in SVB even be able to make payroll? Seems like this could cause huge issues in the short term and long term

Pipe, Clearco, Founderpath, etc, are going to have a busy month.

Likely many companies won’t be able to do mid-month payroll.

Someone will setup a market for the FDIC warrant on uninsured deposits, but that will take time.

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#273

Does this mean $SIVB stock holders who had $265 shares two days ago now have worthless shares? JFC no wonder bank stocks are priced so low compared to earnings... You're just hoping the dividends pay out enough before the inevitable implosion.

In the FDIC priority list, stockholders are dead last, depositors first. If the depositors take any kind of haircut, I'd guess stockholders will end up with exactly zero.

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#274

Now we just need an "incredible journey" blog post from SVB spinning this acquisition as a great win for both customers and investors.

Or a cute 404 page when you login to your account: "Oops, looks like Santa misplaced his bag with all your money! Don't worry, his elves are busy looking for it all over the North Pole."

They've made an oopsie woopsie.

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#275

Wow, the government acted incredibly swiftly and decisively to crush the possibility of a general bank panic. The current US banking system is very different from the 2008 system.

Because SVB was an actual bank with deposits that is FDIC insured. This is their job and they always acted timely in any situation, even before 2008.

Bear Stearns in 2008 was an investment bank, they were not hawking FDIC insured accounts.

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disrupt disrupt disrupt! Those old stodgy banks just slow us down with their old-fashioned risk-averse ways! The cool kids can do it better! If I had a nickel for every time I heard this from actual friends in the past couple decades, or for when I said it myself a few times... :)

Thing is, it's probably true for 1% of the cases, that things are slow for no good reason. Trick is how to identify that 1% of times when you can truly make something better. But 99% of the times, it's all shit and ends up like this, or similarly.

[deleted]

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#278
post #34

First actual FDIC takeover since 2020, I think.

| The last FDIC-insured institution to close was Almena State Bank, Almena, Kansas, on October 23, 2020. From the release.

strong "days since last fatal accident" vibes from that sentence

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#279

What a debacle. Some gallows humor from twitter: "Imagine raising $100m for your AI enabled dog washing app - and your bank sets it on fire before you can". Original: https://twitter.com/88888sAccount/status/1634028258500169731...

Disrupt disrupt disrupt! Those old stodgy banks just slow us down with their old-fashioned risk-averse ways! The cool kids can do it better! If I had a nickel for every time I heard this from actual friends in the past couple decades, or for when I said it myself a few times... :)

But SVB wasn't even doing anything sketchy or disruptive, right?

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah famously the feds step in and cover your deposits when a crypto exchange collapses

You're not supposed to keep your money in exchanges

Yeah famously the feds step in and cover your deposits when [your wallet is compromised|you lost your password|your hard drive crashed|the price of your algorithmic stablecoin goes to zero|you put in the wrong address|you open an NFT that drains your wallet|your DAO hands all its assets out to someone smarter than its programmers].
Post reply on HN