Yet another company mindlessly follows industry trends. Yawn.
Making overblown slow software? They are one of the inventors of it.
Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
191–200 of 234 posts
Re: Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
#192I think the hardest product to replace is Confluence, especially on-prem, when you need your data inside your firewall.
There are many bad things in Confluence: 1. search is completely broken since several versions 2. the editor is not very good 3. it's just too slow
Hoever, there is 1 very good feature, but badly implemented. The ability to add complex objects, like JIRA ticket lists, Children pages, HTML embeds and other dynamic stuff. This helps a lot with building good dynamic pages fast. All the other tools are only
I've been searching high and low for a replacement and still haven't found one.
Also Atlassian got so greedy that they've removed on-prem cheap plans. I really hope someone builds a better Confluence with dynamic objects inside.
And if someone already did that on-premise I'll be really grateful for a hint.
Re: Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
#193hope they give these employees a good exit, it's the leaderships own fault.
Re: Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
#194Re: Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's why I mentioned "incoherent and probably useless other tools". Apparently, they launched some sort of no-code tool for stringing APIs together but still not ready with their GraphQL client. For reference, another company that sells developer tools, JetBrains, has around 2000 employees.
I can't tell where you're driving with the JetBrains comparison. Truthfully, I'm a little surprised they only have 2000 employees. They have a suite of IDEs supporting a multitude of languages, that are almost universally considered best in class. IDEs are not an easy thing to build. They developed and maintain the Kotlin language which has all but become the standard for Android dev. And they have integrated team co…
Re: Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
It will be a blood bath. Postman "Labs", a company that produces a glorified cURL UI and some incoherent most likely useless tools around it received $433M investment at valuation of $2B and apparently has hundreds of employees. Current state of tech is not sustainable.
Their focus group seem to be rather big enterprises, not indie devs/small teams like with insomnia so it's not surprising.
Re: Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
I actually find postman quite useful for the work I do (heavily api-related) - if you work in that space, what other tools would you recommend instead?
I use Postman all the time for work and it is definitely useful. But it seems to be getting worse not better as they tack on more features and make it more complicated. It seems like it's been years since they added anything I need and instead it has just gotten harder to use due to extra fluff. And it's buggier than it's ever been.
Re: Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
postman, another shit product.
I actually find postman quite useful for the work I do (heavily api-related) - if you work in that space, what other tools would you recommend instead?
The Postman UX is not good on it. It's easy to get lost in tabs, they should ditch the tabs and categorize requests under the actual endpoint. There is also no way to easily save like requests and give them better names that is also searchable. It's also built on electron which means its slow and clunky.
There is nothing good in this space. Swagger would do it if they let you save requests to local browser storage and just added a history dropdown to the endpoints. I use swagger and save common requests to a file system and open them in sublime. if its just JSON payloads I am working with it does the job.
Re: Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
Linear
Linear is unfortunately too opinionated. At my last gig my manager wanted everybody to be using the same task tracker (understandably) and I wanted our team to move to a Kanban process because we evolved into the Infra/DevOps/IT team and ended up doing very little product work. At the time there was no way to operate in this paradigm as Linear forced you to use "Cycles" (a proprietary term for a time box) and it mean…
My guess is you wanted a Kanban board but didn't realize you can change the standard ticket view to a board view? If you're in the Active issue view for your team you can click the boxes icon at the top right (or hit cmd-b) to get a kanban view.
Re: Atlassian to shed 5 per cent of workers
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
What? Name one product better than JIRA.
Linear
Linear is essentially a mildly opinionated and hyper fast version of Jira. It will be immediately familiar to anyone coming from Jira, which is a really great thing for adoption.
Don't underestimate the speed feature. The effect here has been that people stop using Jira and only use it at a bare minimum as required by management. People end up moving all of their planning and notes to things like Google Sheets, random docs, or just Apple Notes. Linear is so fast and easy to use I found I was back to doing planning and notes live in the tool because it was easier.
Highly recommend you give it a try. My company is unfortunately already heavily entrenched in Jira and I found a vast amount of work to move us all so I had to abandon our move.