> Premium components Mmmm. Guarantees I'll never touch this.
Some of the choices of what to make premium seem weird too, like zigbee MQTT.
Show HN: Total.js – Low-code development (Node-RED alternative)
51–60 of 83 posts
Re: Show HN: Total.js – Low-code development (Node-RED alternative)
#52Node-RED is really tough for Bun to support because it relies on sloppy mode features like implicit global variable assignment (assigning a variable without var/let/const) and Bun currently treats every file as ESM (and transpiles CJS for compatibility)
For Bun on workflow builders, I'm currently working on making windmill [1] supports bun as an additional runtime to run the typescript scripts/steps. It's not the same as making the workflow engine run with bun (we use Rust) but I thought it might be worth mentioning :) [1]: https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill
Nice
Re: Show HN: Total.js – Low-code development (Node-RED alternative)
#53Node-RED is really tough for Bun to support because it relies on sloppy mode features like implicit global variable assignment (assigning a variable without var/let/const) and Bun currently treats every file as ESM (and transpiles CJS for compatibility)
For Bun on workflow builders, I'm currently working on making windmill [1] supports bun as an additional runtime to run the typescript scripts/steps. It's not the same as making the workflow engine run with bun (we use Rust) but I thought it might be worth mentioning :) [1]: https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill
This looks tremendous, mate. Going to try it later today. Is the self-hosting story good?
Re: Show HN: Total.js – Low-code development (Node-RED alternative)
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
For Bun on workflow builders, I'm currently working on making windmill [1] supports bun as an additional runtime to run the typescript scripts/steps. It's not the same as making the workflow engine run with bun (we use Rust) but I thought it might be worth mentioning :) [1]: https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill
This looks tremendous, mate. Going to try it later today. Is the self-hosting story good?
docker compose up and you're gtg.
We also have helm charts and it can also run from a single binary and a postgresql url. Everything is documented on windmill.dev
Re: Show HN: Total.js – Low-code development (Node-RED alternative)
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
This looks tremendous, mate. Going to try it later today. Is the self-hosting story good?
docker compose up and you're gtg. We also have helm charts and it can also run from a single binary and a postgresql url. Everything is documented on windmill.dev
Fucking brilliant. Inspires confidence.
Re: Show HN: Total.js – Low-code development (Node-RED alternative)
#56To use this service, you check to agree to terms which include this: "By posting Content to the Service, you grant us the right and license to use, modify, publicly perform, publicly display, reproduce, and distribute such Content on and through the Service. You retain any and all of your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Service and you are responsible for protecting those rights. Y…
This type of license is generally required for a service to operate. They could scope it more carefully, but there is nothing _necessarily_ underhand going on here.
> By posting Content to the Service, you grant us the right and license to use, modify, publicly perform, publicly display, reproduce, and distribute such Content on and through the Service.
This says you grant the service a license to store and run your content.
> You retain any and all of your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Service and you are responsible for protecting those rights.
This says you still own your content and responsible for how it is shared. You only gave the service a license.
> You agree that this license includes the right for us to make your Content available to other users of the Service, who may also use your Content subject to these Terms.
This says you give permission for the service to make the content available to others. It does not mean the service will. This part could be worded better. It is presumably linked to sharing or publishing functionality.
> You represent and warrant that: (i) the Content is yours (you own it) or you have the right to use it and grant us the rights and license as provided in these Terms, and (ii) the posting of your Content on or through the Service does not violate the privacy rights, publicity rights, copyrights, contract rights or any other rights of any person.
This part says you're not infringing anybody else's rights by putting content into the service.
So, yes, they could possibly have made it clearer in the license under what circumstances they would make content available to others, but most people don't look to the license to understand that so it's not uncommon to have language like this.
Re: Show HN: Total.js – Low-code development (Node-RED alternative)
#57Re: Show HN: Total.js – Low-code development (Node-RED alternative)
#58To use this service, you check to agree to terms which include this: "By posting Content to the Service, you grant us the right and license to use, modify, publicly perform, publicly display, reproduce, and distribute such Content on and through the Service. You retain any and all of your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Service and you are responsible for protecting those rights. Y…
This type of license is generally required for a service to operate. They could scope it more carefully, but there is nothing _necessarily_ underhand going on here. > By posting Content to the Service, you grant us the right and license to use, modify, publicly perform, publicly display, reproduce, and distribute such Content on and through the Service. This says you grant the service a license to store and run your…
What's missing is the limitations on how they will use it. They need some license for all of the things listed, but this is the maximum permissions rather than the minimum
Re: Show HN: Total.js – Low-code development (Node-RED alternative)
#59Re: Show HN: Total.js – Low-code development (Node-RED alternative)
#60To use this service, you check to agree to terms which include this: "By posting Content to the Service, you grant us the right and license to use, modify, publicly perform, publicly display, reproduce, and distribute such Content on and through the Service. You retain any and all of your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Service and you are responsible for protecting those rights. Y…
It reads as very "the app store can do it so we should too"
Truly we are in the dark ages of open source when everyone believes they are entitled to be a monopoly platform.
Starting to sympathize with stallman more every year.