Live data from Hacker News

US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

bbc.com

141–150 of 526 posts

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#141

I think China erred by sending such a large balloon that was visible to the naked eye, causing the American public to demand it be shot down. There's no hard rule about where national airspace ends and space begins.. a lot of times they fly too high for planes to reach, and under certain circumstances balloons are allowed through national airspace.. so if the balloon isn't causing a problem (like being a hazard to ai…

> There's no hard rule about where national airspace ends and space begins What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? There's no hard rule about when life begins but killing a 5 year old isn't a 22nd trimester abortion, it's murder. 18-60'000 feet is class A, controlled airspace in the US and Canada. When the US sent U2s over the USSR, the rationale wasn't that 70,000 feet was "space", it was that it w…

> What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

What does this mean? I don’t see a reference to tea in the comment you are replying to.

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#142
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

War? Chill with the historonics. Surveillance is not war.

Shooting missiles at aircraft can be though.

I think it's more "part of the game" than a declaration of war.

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's speculation on your part. The DoD has not released any information on what the payload of any of these balloons contains. And going by the size isn't conclusive. The ICESat-2 weather satellite is over 3000lbs, for example. So instruments larger than found on a typical weather balloon clearly do have their place in weather/climate science.

> That's speculation on your part. The DoD has not released any information on what the payload of any of these balloons contains. Not true: https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinese-balloon-carried-antenna...

https://archive.is/oORem

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#145
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Because at least the 2nd object wasn’t, it was described as a cylinder about the size of a car Source?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-shoots-high-altitude-obje... > It was described as "cylindrical and silver-ish gray" and seemed to be floating, a U.S. official said. https://news.sky.com/story/us-shoots-down-unknown-object-fly... > The object, shot down on the order of President Joe Biden, was flying at a high altitude of about 40,000ft and was the size of a small car, the White House said.

Ok. To be fair, all of that could still describe a balloon. Per the ABC news article:

    "It did not appear to have maneuverability capability, he said. "It was virtually at the whim of the wind."

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There's no hard rule about where national airspace ends and space begins What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? There's no hard rule about when life begins but killing a 5 year old isn't a 22nd trimester abortion, it's murder. 18-60'000 feet is class A, controlled airspace in the US and Canada. When the US sent U2s over the USSR, the rationale wasn't that 70,000 feet was "space", it was that it w…

> What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? What does this mean? I don’t see a reference to tea in the comment you are replying to.

It's a common expression https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/What%27s_that_got_to_do_with...

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#147

I think China erred by sending such a large balloon that was visible to the naked eye, causing the American public to demand it be shot down. There's no hard rule about where national airspace ends and space begins.. a lot of times they fly too high for planes to reach, and under certain circumstances balloons are allowed through national airspace.. so if the balloon isn't causing a problem (like being a hazard to ai…

Ranking members of the previous administration have publicly denied that there were any previous balloons and no evidence has been presented that there were previous similar incidents.

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

article states that it was on Canada's orders. I didn't know that was a thing, Canadian PM having the power to command US jets. Can anyone who knows more about NORAD weigh in with an ELI5?

Authorize US jets you mean? Canada is a close US ally, norad allows both US and Canada to learn about the object at the same time, and US may have offered to shoot it down with Canada’s permission since we probably have some new patrols in the area since Friday’s ballon

Ultimately, it's the Canadian Geese at risk so you've got to let them make the final call.

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#149
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because at least the 2nd object wasn’t, it was described as a cylinder about the size of a car which is where all the UFO tic-tac victory mark memes came from.

Yeah, source please, i have not read anything about this and that would be HIGHLY interesting.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/feb/11/alaska-myste...

Re: US aircraft shoots down new airborne object over Canada

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There's no hard rule about where national airspace ends and space begins What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? There's no hard rule about when life begins but killing a 5 year old isn't a 22nd trimester abortion, it's murder. 18-60'000 feet is class A, controlled airspace in the US and Canada. When the US sent U2s over the USSR, the rationale wasn't that 70,000 feet was "space", it was that it w…

> What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? What does this mean? I don’t see a reference to tea in the comment you are replying to.

It’s a euphemism for a nonsequitor, OP is asking what balloon size has to do with it being okay to shoot it down since there’s nothing about size in protected airspace laws.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/price_of_tea_in_China

Post reply on HN