Earlier quoted context omitted.
"because moderate drinkers tend to be very socially advantaged," Naimi says. Moderate drinkers tend to be healthier on average because they're well-educated and more affluent, not because they're drinking a bottle of wine a week on average. "[Their] alcohol consumption ends up looking good from a health perspective because they're already healthy to begin with." https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/03/22/47…
> Moderate drinkers tend to be healthier on average because they're well-educated and more affluent, not because they're drinking a bottle of wine a week on average the point is that non-drinkers live less. Which totally contraddict the point that non drinking is good for you. a recent Lancet study confirms that at 2 standard units per day there is non-drinking equivalence for health risks 2 units per day it's about…
No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
211–220 of 385 posts
Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
#212I fear for a world where alcohol is banned. I feel modern society is built on it. A human is the only animal that is aware they will die. Also unique to humans is that we think about what others think. This makes us very anxious. Alcohol is a known way to relax. It helps calm our minds down. No it's not good for our bodies. But it's very healthy to relax.
Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
#213Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
#214This is not news, it has been known for some time. For anyone wanting to get an in-depth, balanced, and rigorous take on alcohol I can heartily recommend Drink? by David Nutt. Reading it has made me more mindful of when and why I choose to drink, and increasingly I find myself drinking less and less.
Was David Nutt the UK scientific advisor who came out and said weed, lsd, ecstasy are all far less harmful than tobacco and alcohol and was then publicly shamed and abused by the uk Media for daring to suggest such a thing?
Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
#215Cool now do this with refined sugars or high carb diets in general. It'll be the same discussion, addicts trying to rationalize away the science and statistics.
Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
#216What was the first miracle performed by Jesus (as documented in the Christian bible)? Turning water into wine at the wedding in Cana (after they had run out of wine). Would Jesus have done this if alcohol consumption was against God's will? Food for thought. I'm not saying that God wants us to drink, but I think it provides some evidence that God doesn't view alcohol as inherently evil or bad (from Christian perspect…
Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
#217This is ridiculous and boarders on intentionally false & misleading. We look for meaningful or demonstrated risk all the time in our assessments, not the absolute absense of it.
This is typical WHO nonsense similar to their ongoing clanging of the Covid alarm.
Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
#218Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
#219So much denialism going on here, it's like talking to my alcoholic relative. This shouldn't trigger such a strong reaction, if it does, one should look into why that is.
Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
#220The thinking is backwards on this. They state there is no scientific safe drinking level. They even compare it to radiation. The goal is to establish an unsafe level. it's like saying there is no safe speed to drive a car - sure that's technically true, but worthless to say.
Driving isn't hazardous to your health. Crashing is. That's like saying eating is unhealthy to your health because you might choke.
Not that there isn't acceptable tradeoffs with what is attained by driving.