Suspect Eminem himself would have a more nuanced take on this than the ‘of course this is okay’ or ‘this is never okay’ responses it’s getting right here. Number 1: Hip hop’s built (to at least as great an extent as EDM) on sampling. And while the degree of respect for clearing and getting authorization to use samples has varied over the years and between artists, as a reference point, Eminem’s breakthrough ‘My Name…
David Guetta uses ChatGPT and uberduck.ai to deepfake Eminem rap for DJ set
161–170 of 180 posts
Re: David Guetta uses ChatGPT and uberduck.ai to deepfake Eminem rap for DJ set
#162Re: David Guetta uses ChatGPT and uberduck.ai to deepfake Eminem rap for DJ set
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
OpenAI will 100% need to start paying royalties. For instance it knows a whole lot of things that are not publicly available and locked away behind science journal paywalls.
I don't see why that would require them to pay royalties. The training data is also publicly available, https://pile.eleuther.ai/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.00027.pdf
7.1 Legality of Content
While the machine learning community has begun to discuss the issue of the legality of training models on copyright data, there is little acknowledgment of the fact that the processing and distribution of data owned by others may also be a violation of copyright law. As a step in that direction, we discuss the reasons we believe that our use of copyright data is in compliance with US copyright law.
Under pre (1984) (and affirmed in subsequent rulings such as aff (2013); Google (2015)), non-commercial, not-for-profit use of copyright media is preemptively fair use. Additionally, our use is transformative, in the sense that the original form of the data is ineffective for our purposes and our form of the data is ineffective for the purposes of the original documents. Although we use the full text of copyright works, this is not necessarily disqualifying when the full work is necessary (ful, 2003). In our case, the long-term dependencies in natural language require that the full text be used in order to produce the best results (Dai et al., 2019; Rae et al., 2019; Henighan et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2018).
Copyright law varies by country, and there may be additional restrictions on some of these works in particular jurisdictions. To enable easier compliance with local laws, the Pile reproduction code is available and can be used to exclude certain components of the Pile which are inappropriate for the user. Unfortunately, we do not have the metadata necessary to determine exactly which texts are copyrighted, and so this can only be undertaken at the component level. Thus, this should be be taken to be a heuristic rather than a precise determination.
1984. Sony corp. of america v. universal city studios, inc. 2003. Kelly v. arriba soft corp. 2013. Righthaven llc v. hoehn.
Re: David Guetta uses ChatGPT and uberduck.ai to deepfake Eminem rap for DJ set
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
This isn't going to be released commercially, as a very successful artist, he knows that better than most. No record label would release songs without clearing things with the relevant artist. Many artists and DJs don't release live sets/remixes because it would be impossible to clear all the samples, I don't see why this would be any different.
>No record label would release songs without clearing things with the relevant artist. What would that email look like? "Here's some lyrics you never wrote and some audio you've never heard. Can I use it in my song?"
https://genius.com/Kanye-west-kanye-west-and-taylor-swifts-f...
Re: David Guetta uses ChatGPT and uberduck.ai to deepfake Eminem rap for DJ set
#165I was playing with Tortoise TTS and was genuinely surprised by how good it is with just a few minutes of clean audio. It didn’t take me hours to train or fine tune, the generation step is sort of long, 5-7 minutes for 30 seconds, but it feels really similar to stable diffusion where you do quick test with slow samples and iterations to find a decent seed, and then you let it do a more complete regeneration. It’s zero shot generation that ran on my laptop 2070 max q and i7 10750h. It’s not perfect but it’s believable when layered with music.
Re: David Guetta uses ChatGPT and uberduck.ai to deepfake Eminem rap for DJ set
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
Based (how closely ?) on the 1971 black humour science fiction novel "The Futurological Congress" by Stanisław Lem ! (For those that would not know, he coined the term "robot" from the slavic root "work".)
Are you sure? Wikipedia says the word was coined by Karel Capek: https://wikiless.org/wiki/Karel_%C4%8Capek?lang=en
Re: David Guetta uses ChatGPT and uberduck.ai to deepfake Eminem rap for DJ set
#167Re: David Guetta uses ChatGPT and uberduck.ai to deepfake Eminem rap for DJ set
#168Maybe I am late to recognize that, but with recent developments I get the feeling that AI and machine learning are really getting somewhere now. If it goes forward with the current trajectory, then this could change the world just like radio, television or the internet did.
Those things advanced average people’s reach. This is not doing that.
If anything, it potentially puts big studios out of business. Itunes and and Spotify and Youtube become the distribution channels.
Re: David Guetta uses ChatGPT and uberduck.ai to deepfake Eminem rap for DJ set
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think this is true any more. At least, I've heard generated audio from the latest models that runs for well over a minute without obvious artifacts.
I don’t know what else I expected to hear since progress in these spaces is moving crazy quickly. What models?
And VALL-E by Microsoft, which isn't quite as good, but notable because it can clone real voices with only three seconds of training data: https://valle-demo.github.io/
Re: David Guetta uses ChatGPT and uberduck.ai to deepfake Eminem rap for DJ set
#170Maybe I am late to recognize that, but with recent developments I get the feeling that AI and machine learning are really getting somewhere now. If it goes forward with the current trajectory, then this could change the world just like radio, television or the internet did.
Those things advanced average people’s reach. This is not doing that.
The future will not be "look I made an AI song that millions of people are listening to!" but will be "AI create and play me a song of my favorite rapper overlaid onto of my favorite techno genre" and you'll just listen to it yourself.