I really dislike the trend of calling employees by some nickname. "Googler" may have been cute back in the day. Zoomies is pure cringe.
I've seen a few using "Xoogler" on LinkedIn after being laid off and it just smacks of Stockholm syndrome.
Zoom lays off 15% of employees
61–70 of 596 posts
Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees
#62On a side note.... "Zoomies", really?
Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees
#63Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees
#64I really dislike the trend of calling employees by some nickname. "Googler" may have been cute back in the day. Zoomies is pure cringe.
You mean you actually like your job and your company and aren’t a cold cynic who thinks that being emotionally detached from the thing you do for the majority of your waking hours and deciding that anything cute and fun is childish makes you somehow superior — haha criiiiiinge.
Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees
#65> As the CEO and founder of Zoom, I am accountable for these mistakes and the actions we take today– and I want to show accountability not just in words but in my own actions. To that end, I am reducing my salary for the coming fiscal year by 98% and foregoing my FY23 corporate bonus. Members of my executive leadership team will reduce their base salaries by 20% for the coming fiscal year while also forfeiting their…
>To that end, I am reducing my salary for the coming fiscal year by 98% and foregoing my FY23 corporate bonus. What about equity grants?
Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the CEO should be under review by the board for allowing this to happen Unfortunately, "all the other CEOs were doing it too" will probably hold up extremely well as a justification – in the unlikely case it ever comes to that.
If there is fat to cut that means they were paying staff to do work that was unnecessary or wasteful which is money out of investor's pockets.
Other than that, the sometimes toxic dynamics of sudden windfalls in funding have also been discussed here at length: Paradoxically, not spending investors' money can sometimes be considered worse than wasting it on moonshot projects (or even outright on fancy office furniture and eye-catching employee perks).
Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees
#67Would they have joined if Zoom had disclosed on hiring them, "We're experiencing a once-in-a-lifetime growth spurt because of COVID. If and when that ends, we may have to lay you off." ??
Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees
#68Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees
#69> As the CEO and founder of Zoom, I am accountable for these mistakes and the actions we take today– and I want to show accountability not just in words but in my own actions. To that end, I am reducing my salary for the coming fiscal year by 98% and foregoing my FY23 corporate bonus. Members of my executive leadership team will reduce their base salaries by 20% for the coming fiscal year while also forfeiting their…
Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees
#70> As the CEO and founder of Zoom, I am accountable for these mistakes and the actions we take today– and I want to show accountability not just in words but in my own actions. To that end, I am reducing my salary for the coming fiscal year by 98% and foregoing my FY23 corporate bonus. Members of my executive leadership team will reduce their base salaries by 20% for the coming fiscal year while also forfeiting their…
I agree, but it's a lot easier for a Founder CEO with 22% ownership of the company to do. It's completely not comparable to a CEO hired with no initial equity stake. Just for illustration. The 10% stock price jump this message caused just earned him $500+ million