Live data from Hacker News

Zoom lays off 15% of employees

blog.zoom.us

21–30 of 596 posts

Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees

#23

> We have made the tough but necessary decision to reduce our team by approximately 15% and say goodbye to around 1,300 hardworking, talented colleagues. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/ZM/zoom-video-comm... Zoom Video Communications total number of employees in 2022 was 6,787, a 53.48% increase from 2021. Zoom Video Communications total number of employees in 2021 was 4,422, a 74.64% increase from 2020. Zo…

This is tragic for those involved, but I really don't understand how there were 6700+ people working on Zoom. I feel like the CEO should be under review by the board for allowing this to happen and there should be further investigations into how they even arrived at this point because this is just bananas.

> the CEO should be under review by the board for allowing this to happen

Unfortunately, "all the other CEOs were doing it too" will probably hold up extremely well as a justification – in the unlikely case it ever comes to that.

Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees

#26

> We have made the tough but necessary decision to reduce our team by approximately 15% and say goodbye to around 1,300 hardworking, talented colleagues. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/ZM/zoom-video-comm... Zoom Video Communications total number of employees in 2022 was 6,787, a 53.48% increase from 2021. Zoom Video Communications total number of employees in 2021 was 4,422, a 74.64% increase from 2020. Zo…

I'd be hugely surprised if they had more than 40% engineering.

Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees

#28
post #7

He is taking a 98% paycut on salary and foregoing his bonus, but I wonder what his equity based comp is as a % of his total comp. My guess is he is mostly compensated in equity.

My thought exactly. How about resetting unvested equity to zero or some similar “I got all these grants while apparently mismanaging the company so maybe I should not have”

Re: Zoom lays off 15% of employees

#30
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is tragic for those involved, but I really don't understand how there were 6700+ people working on Zoom. I feel like the CEO should be under review by the board for allowing this to happen and there should be further investigations into how they even arrived at this point because this is just bananas.

> the CEO should be under review by the board for allowing this to happen Unfortunately, "all the other CEOs were doing it too" will probably hold up extremely well as a justification – in the unlikely case it ever comes to that.

If there is fat to cut that means they were paying staff to do work that was unnecessary or wasteful which is money out of investor's pockets.
Post reply on HN