As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anomalous phenomena

Post by godelski » Mon, Feb 06, 2023, 6:42 PM UTC

naasking wrote: post #767

godelski wrote: post #686

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Problem is that this technology breaks our understanding of causality. So it isn't a "less wrong" type of situation so much as we have to rewrite everything. Specifically it means things that happen in the future can affect things in the past (communication past the light cone). The discoveries of quantum and relativity didn't break classical mechanics so much as extend it. But to rewrite how a sequence of events hap…

> Specifically it means things that happen in the future can affect things in the past (communication past the light cone). Sure, and that's not a problem so as long as self-consistency is preserved. > But to rewrite how a sequence of events happens, well that's a big fundamental change. Depends how you look at it. There are retrocausal explanations of quantum mechanics, for instance.

Post by LarryMullins » Mon, Feb 06, 2023, 7:13 PM UTC

csomar wrote: post #412

snickerbockers wrote: post #145

There's a real problem with people being close-minded towards anything that seems fantastical. This includes scientists and other professionals who ought to know better. Obviously it's unscientific to jump to conclusions and assume that anything that doesn't make sense must be aliens or magic or whatever but at the same time, it's also unscientific to ignore physical observations just because they seem like something…

I am not. However, I do not accept a closed-minded alien. The alien is interested in particular US military installations but not in me? Okay, maybe not me, but wouldn't the pyramids be more interesting? This makes it boils down to 1. sensors artifacts, 2. US military program not shared with all pilots or 3. another country collecting data on US.

Post by LarryMullins » Mon, Feb 06, 2023, 7:21 PM UTC

stevenhuang wrote: post #26

mr_sturd wrote: post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The pulsating in the NARCAP video looks like the camera trying and failing to find focus on anything that it's looking at. Interesting though.

Camera autofocus is commonly brought up but in this case the crewmen were able to attest to the pulsating with their eyeballs, in addition to the other strange behaviour as noted in their testimony.

Post by marmetio » Mon, Feb 06, 2023, 7:31 PM UTC

likeabbas wrote: post #836

marmetio wrote: post #835

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They already responded to FOIA requests, briefed Congress publicly and privately, and announced AARO when they didn't have to. We're pretty well-informed, and Congress has some oversight. It's very ordinary.

This subject is anything but ordinary. The former Deputy Secretary of Defense for Intelligence wrote a blog alleging that there are black projects hidden within DoD contractors that are reverse engineering non-human intelligence craft. He's presented enough evidence to congress for them to add specific legislation to bring these programs to light.

Post by LarryMullins » Mon, Feb 06, 2023, 7:33 PM UTC

carlosjobim wrote: post #367

serf wrote: post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

giant squid have a biological premise; they're just bigger squid. Their origin can be strongly guessed. You would be smart to guess that there are bigger copies of nearly any remote species in the ocean. we have yet to find a plethora of ocean-dwelling smaller mermaids and 'tic-tacs'. In fact, we've yet to discover solid evidence of the existence of either phenomena, regardless of size. Chances start to diminish in t…

Giant squid was dismissed as tall tales for hundreds of years. Would a mermaid creature be something improbable to an ancient mariner, who hadn't even heard of anything like a monkey before he saw them with his own eyes? > You would be smart to guess that there are bigger copies of nearly any remote species in the ocean. Would you then say it is probable that species of giant shark exist to this day?