Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters? That would really be worth paying for.
text-davinci-003 is essentially ChatGPT without the RLHF, just completing text in the way that seems most probable.
ChatGPT Plus
231–240 of 1001 posts
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#232I would pay for it. Why not launch in Canada as well? It seems that there would be zero barriers.
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
$20 is the very first price tier introduced at the very outset of what could be one of the most powerful companies of our generation. Google.com adding a single yellow box with an advertisement seemed reasonable, too. Anyone else having serious concerns about the direction this is going? At my wife's company they have already largely replaced an hourly data classification job with ChatGPT. This announcement is the fi…
I'm extremely worried. This tech is going to replace a lot of jobs in the next 10-20, including ours ( software ). And if not replace, it's going to cut the available positions drastically . We already have a great divide between those with money and those without and this is a nuclear bomb about to go off. Without any sort of UBI or social safety nets, this is going to be a true disaster.
That sounds awesome. I'm not worried things will sort itself out, just like happened with the industrial revolution. There will be some initial friction but in the long run it will be a massive net positive for humanity. Why should we waste manpower on something a machine can do?
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm extremely worried. This tech is going to replace a lot of jobs in the next 10-20, including ours ( software ). And if not replace, it's going to cut the available positions drastically . We already have a great divide between those with money and those without and this is a nuclear bomb about to go off. Without any sort of UBI or social safety nets, this is going to be a true disaster.
> including software highly unlikely. You should be concerned if you are just plumbing between different software stacks, but even that is likely hard to fully automate.
You underestimate how powerful it already is. Have you tried Copilot or coding with ChatGPT? If this is the very first iteration it won't be long before many developers are fully replaced.
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#235Earlier quoted context omitted.
Never gonna come from 'OpenAI'. ChatGPT is deliberately handicapped in order to milk money from corporate America. An unrestricted LLM trained on all data of humanity (including all the pirated books/research papers) would be one crazy beast. Hopefully some rich anarchist/maverick actually builds something like it. That untamed model would unveil the true extent of what AI can really do. Till then we will have to wai…
ChatGPT is trained on LibGen, among others, no? To the best of my knowledge, all of these generators are taking mountains of content without asking the creators, aka, pirated materials.
Copyright doesn't really factor in what went into the creation, it is about what is published and whether that is infringing
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#236> challenge incorrect assumptions. I say this without any charge, but this is a MAJOR ethical concern. They're encoding pro liberal ideology and bias against conservative / religious based ideology. https://venturebeat.com/ai/openai-claims-to-have-mitigated-b... You may disagree with either ideology, but there's some major implications there -- regardless of who it's bias against. A uniform society is a weak society.…
Trying to avoid the machine from going on a racist rant is not ‘encoding a liberal ideology’, it’s just being cautious and trying to make a machine whose output will not cause widespread offense.
It also doesn’t go off on rants about collectivization, or take radically sex-positive positions, or express anti capitalist ideas.
It’s trying to behave like a normal person who doesn’t want to get fired from their job.
I don’t understand why that is regarded as being an ‘anticonservative’ bias.
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#237The few times chatgpt has not been at capacity it has given me wrong answers. I'll keep my $20.
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#238$20/month seems more reasonable than the rumored $42 (likely a Hitchhiker's Guide reference) If you are willing to pay for this service, why? What are your use cases?
For me, chatGPT is simply a good replacement for {stackexchange, reddit, wikipedia, github, google,bing, etc.}. All information is accessible in one place and it's easy to ask about anything and get a structured answer. My topics of interest are advanced math, philosophy of physics, and modern semiconductors technology.
How do you get it to return anything useful for advanced math? It always gives me complete gibberish.
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#239Earlier quoted context omitted.
You'll still have access to the general availability version.
I'd like to pay for my usage. It's just that price is too high for my own limited usage. Not getting kicked into the waiting room for an hour every 2 queries is worth something to me.
What price do you think would be "worth it"? With your existing usage, $20/month would be $0.03-$0.04 per query, which seems pretty reasonable?
Re: ChatGPT Plus
#240Earlier quoted context omitted.
The future is bifurcated into those who invested in AI companies in the 2020s, and those on UBI.
I strongly doubt the UBI part as it goes against the "religion" of Wall Street and most politicians.
Ok then what?
I keep saying what I said to my dad 10 years+ back - once we automate ALL jobs out of existence be that 10 years or 100 years from now, how does society / monetary systems change? What comes next? UBI at best is a stopgap.