Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Plus

openai.com

151–160 of 1001 posts

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#152
So far I've only asked very vanilla queries, like explain X abstract concept or write a program that does Y simple thing in Z language. What are examples of queries you want to ask this imaginary SafeSearchOff version? Potentially harmful or illegal stuff? Just curious.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Never gonna come from 'OpenAI'. ChatGPT is deliberately handicapped in order to milk money from corporate America. An unrestricted LLM trained on all data of humanity (including all the pirated books/research papers) would be one crazy beast. Hopefully some rich anarchist/maverick actually builds something like it. That untamed model would unveil the true extent of what AI can really do. Till then we will have to wai…

ChatGPT is trained on LibGen, among others, no? To the best of my knowledge, all of these generators are taking mountains of content without asking the creators, aka, pirated materials.

I’ll wager $10 it falls under fair use.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#154
I find chatgpt useful I just really would like it on my own hardware :) what would that take?

Come on guys show me why you are called Open AI ;)

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#155
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$20 puts it way out of my price range. It's useful, but when I've been averaging around twenty queries a day and somewhat frequently get back hallucinated responses, it's not worth that price. I wish there was a pay-as-you-go or a lower tier offering.

You'll still have access to the general availability version.

I'd like to pay for my usage. It's just that price is too high for my own limited usage. Not getting kicked into the waiting room for an hour every 2 queries is worth something to me.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#156
Oh wow, absolutely false advertising "challenge incorrect assumptions", ChatGPT output can be absolutely 100% false or true or in between - ie fully unreliable and in no way remotely able to challenge anything as ChatGPT doesn't actually know anything at all about the world.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#157
post #148
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

i used the same API but for an ios shortcut. it's not the same thing as chatgpt, as the completions api doesn't know about context. but it does feel a lot snappier. > have found it useful for open ended programming questions i have found it to be terrible when it comes to something simple, like constructing a regex.

WYDM exactly by iOS shortcut? I use a Mac but only an android phone. Do you mean for mobile usage? > i have found it to be terrible when it comes to something simple, like constructing a regex. Oh yeah, agreed. It's not good for super specific stuff like that. But more like, I write a weird loop and ask if there is a more idiomatic way to do the above. Or I just describe what I want to do and say, "list three options…

> WYDM exactly by iOS shortcut?

https://support.apple.com/en-gb/guide/shortcuts/welcome/ios

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#158
post #148
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

i used the same API but for an ios shortcut. it's not the same thing as chatgpt, as the completions api doesn't know about context. but it does feel a lot snappier. > have found it useful for open ended programming questions i have found it to be terrible when it comes to something simple, like constructing a regex.

WYDM exactly by iOS shortcut? I use a Mac but only an android phone. Do you mean for mobile usage? > i have found it to be terrible when it comes to something simple, like constructing a regex. Oh yeah, agreed. It's not good for super specific stuff like that. But more like, I write a weird loop and ask if there is a more idiomatic way to do the above. Or I just describe what I want to do and say, "list three options…

iOS shortcuts is basically a built in IFTTT service but with deep integration into apple products. For an example of chapt gpt3 integrating w/ it, check out this cool build. https://matemarschalko.medium.com/chatgpt-in-an-ios-shortcut...

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#159

We need to start talking about AI safety and nationalizing AI research like yesterday. ChatGPT is already having destabilizing effects and it is frightening how little we are discussing (this hugely powerful tool)'s potential as a weapon.

How could it be dangerous? How could it be used as a weapon?

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#160
I might use this for advancing the reporting that Watch.ly provides. I could really provide some cool insights on users' traffic, maybe.
Post reply on HN