Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Plus

openai.com

101–110 of 1001 posts

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#101

Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters? That would really be worth paying for.

It feels like they've really been tightening the screws down on its "safety". Early on I was able to get it to write interesting screenplay dialogue. It would object to writing anything for characters with an evil intent until I would tell it to behave as if it were evil, then it would oblige.

Now I can't get it to write any dialogue for a bad guy no matter what I do, which makes it pretty useless as a writing tool for fiction.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#102
post #68
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Use their API. They have models in their API with similar capabilities and without guardrails.

The GPT-3.5 model needs more guidance and tweaking with parameters than ChatGPT. They are actively monitoring the use of their APIs. On twitter there are people who claim they have been banned by OpenAI for generating racist texts with the raw API/playground.

Great news. The models are there, if you want to train your own racist-bot-001 people are more than welcome to.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes please. It really needs a “safe search off” mode. It can have a big disclaimer “if you ask for something offensive then you’ll get it”.

The problem is that they actually want to shape the narrative to "safe" content that they approve of. It's disguised moral and political activism.

Agreed and it's a very strange activism. You can get it to tell a joke about men, but you cannot get it to tell a joke about women. Go figure that one out

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes please. It really needs a “safe search off” mode. It can have a big disclaimer “if you ask for something offensive then you’ll get it”.

I can just see the article now: OpenAI is run by a bunch of violent racist sexist rapists. Using the new "safe search off mode", we found out ChatGPT's underlying biases, and it turns out that it's horrible, the people that made it are horrible, and you're a horrible person for using their service. But really we're horrible for writing this article. OpenAI doesn't want that story to be written, but after Microsoft Ta…

The whole point of OpenAI in the first place is to get out ahead of those type of concerns. Do you want people like David Duke and the KKK pumping out copy with ChatGPT? Because if you don't have some type of filters, that's what you'll get. And if you decide to have _some_ filters, there's some line you have to decide on somewhere. For now, they're keeping it pretty G rated in the stuff your average knuckle dragger can access. Nerfing it and rolling out edgier things slowly I'd say is the right call.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#105
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can just see the article now: OpenAI is run by a bunch of violent racist sexist rapists. Using the new "safe search off mode", we found out ChatGPT's underlying biases, and it turns out that it's horrible, the people that made it are horrible, and you're a horrible person for using their service. But really we're horrible for writing this article. OpenAI doesn't want that story to be written, but after Microsoft Ta…

I can Google all of that stuff, yet I don't see such articles about Google.

There is enough understanding of Google that people won't attack it for producing the results asked for. I think AI isn't as well understood and people have more reason to attack it right now, meaning the outcome of such fear mongering will be far more destructive.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#106

$20 seems reasonable. I wonder how are they going to deal with "unreasonable intensive usage" aka people/companies offering "AI" in their products when in reality they just act as a proxy between people paying them ( sometimes a lot of money ) and OpenAI.

It would be relatively easy. Restrict number of queries to something like 1 req/sec.

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#107
I've been using ChatGPT pretty consistently during the workday and have found it useful for open ended programming questions, "cleaning up" rough bullet points into a coherent paragraph of text, etc. $20/month useful is questionable though, especially with all the filters. My "in between" solution has been to configure BetterTouchTool (Mac App) with a hotkey for "Transform & Replace Selection with Javascript". This is intended for doing text transforms, but putting an API call instead seems to work fine. I highlight some text, usually just an open ended "prompt" I typed in the IDE, or Notes app, or an email body, hit the hotkey, and ~1s later it adds the answer underneath. This works...surprisingly well. It feels almost native to the OS. And it's cheaper than $20/month, assuming you aren't feeding it massive documents worth of text or expecting paragraphs in response. I've been averaging like 2-10c a day, depending on use.

Here is the javascript if anyone wants to do something similar. I don't know JS really, so I'm sure it could be improved. But it seems to work fine. You can add your own hard coded prompt if you want even.

    async (clipboardContentString) => {
        try {
          const response = await fetch("https://api.openai.com/v1/completions", {
            method: "POST",
            headers: {
              "Content-Type": "application/json",
              "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR API KEY HERE"
            },
            body: JSON.stringify({
              model: "text-davinci-003",
              prompt: `${clipboardContentString}.`,
              temperature: 0,
              max_tokens: 256
            })
          });
          const data = await response.json();
          const text = data.choices[0].text;
        return `${clipboardContentString} ${text}`;
        } catch (error) {
          return "Error"
        }
      }

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#108
post #21
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Use their API. They have models in their API with similar capabilities and without guardrails.

There is no ChatGPT API.

Bottom of the link OP shared, there's a reference to a chatGPT API waiting list form:

https://share.hsforms.com/1u4goaXwDRKC9-x9IvKno0A4sk30

Re: ChatGPT Plus

#110
I feel they are not playing their cards right. Obv ChatGPT is a huge success and more importantly, very useful. But it's clear that soon Google Search will have something similar for users and for free because they display ads. How many people are going to pay $20 for ChatGPT then even if it's slightly better? (for the web interface, not talking about the API)

I know they are still making it free for everyone, but the current free service is not that reliable and likely never be as reliable and fast as Google Search. (and by definition too; if it was reliable then no one would need to pay for it)

One more thing. I know that ChatGPT is a dialog and not just a Q&A system. Also, even when not using it as part of a dialog, people submit very long snippets of text, not something that the Google search interface is a good fit for. But I'm assuming Google are working on changing their entire search interface.

Post reply on HN