Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters? That would really be worth paying for.
Now I can't get it to write any dialogue for a bad guy no matter what I do, which makes it pretty useless as a writing tool for fiction.
101–110 of 1001 posts
Is there never going to be a version with less restrictions and filters? That would really be worth paying for.
Now I can't get it to write any dialogue for a bad guy no matter what I do, which makes it pretty useless as a writing tool for fiction.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Use their API. They have models in their API with similar capabilities and without guardrails.
The GPT-3.5 model needs more guidance and tweaking with parameters than ChatGPT. They are actively monitoring the use of their APIs. On twitter there are people who claim they have been banned by OpenAI for generating racist texts with the raw API/playground.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes please. It really needs a “safe search off” mode. It can have a big disclaimer “if you ask for something offensive then you’ll get it”.
The problem is that they actually want to shape the narrative to "safe" content that they approve of. It's disguised moral and political activism.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes please. It really needs a “safe search off” mode. It can have a big disclaimer “if you ask for something offensive then you’ll get it”.
I can just see the article now: OpenAI is run by a bunch of violent racist sexist rapists. Using the new "safe search off mode", we found out ChatGPT's underlying biases, and it turns out that it's horrible, the people that made it are horrible, and you're a horrible person for using their service. But really we're horrible for writing this article. OpenAI doesn't want that story to be written, but after Microsoft Ta…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can just see the article now: OpenAI is run by a bunch of violent racist sexist rapists. Using the new "safe search off mode", we found out ChatGPT's underlying biases, and it turns out that it's horrible, the people that made it are horrible, and you're a horrible person for using their service. But really we're horrible for writing this article. OpenAI doesn't want that story to be written, but after Microsoft Ta…
I can Google all of that stuff, yet I don't see such articles about Google.
$20 seems reasonable. I wonder how are they going to deal with "unreasonable intensive usage" aka people/companies offering "AI" in their products when in reality they just act as a proxy between people paying them ( sometimes a lot of money ) and OpenAI.
Here is the javascript if anyone wants to do something similar. I don't know JS really, so I'm sure it could be improved. But it seems to work fine. You can add your own hard coded prompt if you want even.
async (clipboardContentString) => {
try {
const response = await fetch("https://api.openai.com/v1/completions", {
method: "POST",
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Authorization": "Bearer YOUR API KEY HERE"
},
body: JSON.stringify({
model: "text-davinci-003",
prompt: `${clipboardContentString}.`,
temperature: 0,
max_tokens: 256
})
});
const data = await response.json();
const text = data.choices[0].text;
return `${clipboardContentString} ${text}`;
} catch (error) {
return "Error"
}
}Earlier quoted context omitted.
Use their API. They have models in their API with similar capabilities and without guardrails.
There is no ChatGPT API.
I know they are still making it free for everyone, but the current free service is not that reliable and likely never be as reliable and fast as Google Search. (and by definition too; if it was reliable then no one would need to pay for it)
One more thing. I know that ChatGPT is a dialog and not just a Q&A system. Also, even when not using it as part of a dialog, people submit very long snippets of text, not something that the Google search interface is a good fit for. But I'm assuming Google are working on changing their entire search interface.