Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s not my understanding of materiality at all. If the material information he provided was true then all the other silliness is just silliness. I mean, the agent is going to search on the name, probably find a photo in a license database, and confirm the guy is who he says he is, and that is the only point of asking for ID. They are hardly strong authenticators, and no professional is going to take some random bi…
Creditability of statements made by an investigator, witnesses, suspect, etc — are obviously material to an investigation and intentionally providing fictitious documents might be a crime, basis for throwing out testimony, throwing out evidence, etc. Nothing for or against Woz, but I for sure would never intentionally provide fictitious information or document to US federal investigator if situation ever presented it…
Well yeah, I agree with you there. I wouldn’t have done it. Not that I think it’s right, but I suppose that being an old white billionaire changes the equation somewhat.