Live data from Hacker News

Evidence that Adani Group has engaged in stock manipulation and accounting fraud

hindenburgresearch.com

211–220 of 230 posts

Re: Evidence that Adani Group has engaged in stock manipulation and accounting fraud

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What exactly are you objecting to when it comes to billionaires, though? The nominal wealth? The relative wealth? Whichever metric, where is the point where it goes into "immoral" territory and what is the justification for choosing that point over another?

I'm objecting to the idea, ethically, that a single person can own so much money. 1 billion is far beyond what anyone needs to have a comfortable life. Whatever the line is, 1 billion is clearly on the other side of it. I'm not interested in sorites paradox-ing the question beyond that.

That's alright because most billionaires don't have that much money, they have wealth, which isn't really the same.

Also there's probably lots of billionaires here in Indonesia, where 1B IDR is only $67k USD. Do you object to Indonesian billionaires as well? Or does it only matter if you're a billionaire in USD? What if I'm a billionaire in GBP?

Do you really believe that everyone on earth should only be allowed to have exactly what is needed to "have a comfortable life" (which definition of comfortable we're following seems like another quandary that we'll ignore for the moment) and nothing more?

Re: Evidence that Adani Group has engaged in stock manipulation and accounting fraud

#212
The Mauritius connection is interesting. India and Mauritius have tax treaties[1] which are very advantageous to Indian companies seeking to do business abroad. I don't know the full details but I do know that international companies who have an India presence, are frequently set up with a Mauritius company owning the India entity and doing some sort of back to back billing arrangement.

[1] https://www.forbesindia.com/blog/economy-policy/india-maurit...

Re: Evidence that Adani Group has engaged in stock manipulation and accounting fraud

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm objecting to the idea, ethically, that a single person can own so much money. 1 billion is far beyond what anyone needs to have a comfortable life. Whatever the line is, 1 billion is clearly on the other side of it. I'm not interested in sorites paradox-ing the question beyond that.

That's alright because most billionaires don't have that much money, they have wealth, which isn't really the same. Also there's probably lots of billionaires here in Indonesia, where 1B IDR is only $67k USD. Do you object to Indonesian billionaires as well? Or does it only matter if you're a billionaire in USD? What if I'm a billionaire in GBP? Do you really believe that everyone on earth should only be allowed to h…

Of course I'm referring to USD billionaires.

Yes, in general I think people shouldn't have more wealth than is needed to live a comfortable life, for some reasonable definition of comfortable. I'm not a communist -- I don't want everyone to have exactly the same level of wealth or anything like that. I think it's great that people are rewarded for pro-social activities (though capitalism has a very narrow definition of pro-social).

As I said before, I'm uninterested in sorites paradoxes.

Re: Evidence that Adani Group has engaged in stock manipulation and accounting fraud

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's alright because most billionaires don't have that much money, they have wealth, which isn't really the same. Also there's probably lots of billionaires here in Indonesia, where 1B IDR is only $67k USD. Do you object to Indonesian billionaires as well? Or does it only matter if you're a billionaire in USD? What if I'm a billionaire in GBP? Do you really believe that everyone on earth should only be allowed to h…

Of course I'm referring to USD billionaires. Yes, in general I think people shouldn't have more wealth than is needed to live a comfortable life, for some reasonable definition of comfortable. I'm not a communist -- I don't want everyone to have exactly the same level of wealth or anything like that. I think it's great that people are rewarded for pro-social activities (though capitalism has a very narrow definition…

I think the fundamental issue with your philosophy is that by focusing on people that "have too much" instead of primarily worrying about people having too little, you will end up in a situation where you actually have a harder time solving the latter because people don't bother to strive for the former.

Re: Evidence that Adani Group has engaged in stock manipulation and accounting fraud

#217
post #68

If these companies assets or stocks go to zero or are locked due to fraud or something that makes the actual public stocks untradable, how do you get out of a short position? Borrowing and selling the stock means you can’t get it back to return to the original owner, and buying put options means you can’t sell the stock to the contract holder. Do you have to get out before it gets completely vaporized?

They could have used put options or Credit Default swaps.

Re: Evidence that Adani Group has engaged in stock manipulation and accounting fraud

#219
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand why any entity is "too big to fail".

My understanding is that if an entity going down results in a widespread wealth destruction in the entire domain then it's deemed to be too-big-to-fail. It would in turn lead to social unrest threatening the stability of government. Like a huge lender going bust would lead to credit shrinkage leading to millions of small/medium businesses going bust.

Yup you're right. It's more like Adani's lenders might threaten social stability if Adani becomes insolvent. But I'm pretty sure the govt will give SBI a cash injection and have them loan that amount to Adani in the event that things actually get bad.

Re: Evidence that Adani Group has engaged in stock manipulation and accounting fraud

#220
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don’t have to “prove” anything, you already got the money

You're still stuck paying borrow fees and posting collateral, potentially forever.

This is just wrong. If the stock is delisted you no longer are "borrowing" anything. There is nothing to borrow.
Post reply on HN