Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Container Extension

addons.mozilla.org

101–107 of 107 posts

Re: Facebook Container Extension

#101
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These extensions are killer, and are the primary reason I use Firefox. No other browsers have similar functionality at all that I've found. For me, it's the best setup I've found in terms of cookie/session management. By default, I do want every new tab I open to come with a clean slate of no cookies, local storage, SQLite, or whatever other storage/tracking mechanisms are invented. If I need to open up a Google serv…

The key insight for me was that persistence should be opt-in—when I want a website to remember me, I take action to express that—the opposite of the current norm. I sometimes wonder whether Google was strategically preempting this paradigm when they mainstreamed ephemeral sessions under the framing of sneaky mode.

The vast majority of people find persistent sessions convenient.

If you don't want cookies, you can turn them off for all sites (with exceptions) or for some sites.

Re: Facebook Container Extension

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For discussion about it. https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/chromium-dev/c/IZ... In response to asking about supporting multiple profiles between different tabs. >Extraordinarily difficult. I would expect person-years of effort for this, as the link between profile and window is deeply ingrained throughout the code. Chrome doesn't support containers because it would take a big investment that no one is curren…

It is a lie when we know ghost browsers essentially do the same. I think it is just not in the best interest of Google because it might hurt their bottom line i.e. ads.

You can open a new window for a separate session, just not a new tab.

Re: Facebook Container Extension

#103
post #101
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The key insight for me was that persistence should be opt-in—when I want a website to remember me, I take action to express that—the opposite of the current norm. I sometimes wonder whether Google was strategically preempting this paradigm when they mainstreamed ephemeral sessions under the framing of sneaky mode.

The vast majority of people find persistent sessions convenient. If you don't want cookies, you can turn them off for all sites (with exceptions) or for some sites.

rejecting cookies ≠ giving them a short lifetime

Cookies aren’t inherently bad. If a second party asks me to hold on to something while I’m actively engaged with it, that’s typically fine. At the end of the day, though, I’m deciding what to take home.

Re: Facebook Container Extension

#105

Related: Multi Account Containers - Same thing as the facebook container but more generi - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account... Temporary Containers - Same container concept but you can create and destroy them on the fly - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/temporary-con...

These extensions are killer, and are the primary reason I use Firefox. No other browsers have similar functionality at all that I've found. For me, it's the best setup I've found in terms of cookie/session management. By default, I do want every new tab I open to come with a clean slate of no cookies, local storage, SQLite, or whatever other storage/tracking mechanisms are invented. If I need to open up a Google serv…

I agree. Google and Firefox have a high number and quality of plugins, but Google Chrome has a larger market for plugins and it is easier to find plugins for specific features. However, Firefox supports plugins in the WebExtensions format, which is compatible with Google Chrome, but also supports other formats such as XUL and XPCOM that give developers more control

Re: Facebook Container Extension

#106

Related: Multi Account Containers - Same thing as the facebook container but more generi - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account... Temporary Containers - Same container concept but you can create and destroy them on the fly - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/temporary-con...

Temporary containers are the final solution to cookie based tracking, just like how forwarding services like Simplelogin (not affiliated) is the final solution to email spam. They have very similar underlying principles: reduce exposure by reducing the power you grant and starting afresh every time to avoid information leakage. With temporary containers, only whitelisted sites can have persistent storage and they are…

Facebook Container works by isolating your Facebook identity into a separate container that makes it harder for Facebook to track your visits to other websites with third-party cookies.

Re: Facebook Container Extension

#107
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a privacy feature, specially when paired with Cookie Auto Delete. I have CAD setup to always delete cookies when I close all tabs of a website. But I can add exceptions per website and per container. So I have a Google container that is the only place where I allow Google to leave cookies on my browser. I do the same for a several other websites. Sure, Google can always track you somehow, like IP address, but i…

do you realize CAD is unnecessary because Firefox has site isolation for a few years already? anyways, it's CAD the one providing you that sense of privacy, not the container.

I don't just want cookie isolation. I want cookie obliteration.
Post reply on HN