361–370 of 677 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If it asks for it.
The page literally says the pronouns are "it/she" so you can call her "she" and no one should be offended, correct?
This would indicate that maia wants to be referred to as "it" as the subject of a clause and "she" otherwise.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please give maia the respect she deserves and use the correct pronouns.
She goes by it, so go look in the mirror. We're all trying our best here.
As a software engineer even I sometimes can't help romanticising hacking in my imagination. But so many times it turns out to be just like some company left the front gate wide open and the "hacker" walked in and took a look around. Eg when an airline had a public API where you could get someone's passport number and details just from their boarding pass https://mango.pdf.zone/finding-former-australian-prime-minis...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just had one today that had the last char of a field as '\', which escaped the closing quote and then munged the column count from there.
Isn't that your parser's problem? I don't think true CSV has any special characters other than comma, quote, and CRLF.
So the following Excel export I just did will parse perfect fine with your CSV parser but give you completely the wrong thing:
1;2,3;3,3
2;7,3;9,3
3;4,5;7,5Earlier quoted context omitted.
The page literally says the pronouns are "it/she" so you can call her "she" and no one should be offended, correct?
Doesn't sound right to me. A normal clause of that form would look like "she/her" and indicate that the pronoun is "she" as the subject of a clause and "her" otherwise. This would indicate that maia wants to be referred to as "it" as the subject of a clause and "she" otherwise.
Do you mean that instead of saying "it's her apple" you'd say "it's she apple"?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Basically any air charter service (no matter how small) will have access to the no fly list. It's honestly surprising that it's not up to date online within minutes.
If I was the US government, I would add some fake but legitimate-looking IDs in such lists, different ones for every airline I send the list to, so I can identify who leaked the list ex post facto, and come down with God's Wrath on any airline that leaked theirs. But then, I am not a Bond-esque criminal organization bent for world domination.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doesn't sound right to me. A normal clause of that form would look like "she/her" and indicate that the pronoun is "she" as the subject of a clause and "her" otherwise. This would indicate that maia wants to be referred to as "it" as the subject of a clause and "she" otherwise.
That.....frankly doesn't make sense, or it breaks the English language in ways that I'm not familiar with(admittedly it's not my first language). Do you mean that instead of saying "it's her apple" you'd say "it's she apple"?
Correct; it is massively ungrammatical.
> Do you mean that instead of saying "it's her apple" you'd say "it's she apple"?
No possessive form is indicated. But instead of saying "I gave it a dress", you would say "I gave she a dress".
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That.....frankly doesn't make sense, or it breaks the English language in ways that I'm not familiar with(admittedly it's not my first language). Do you mean that instead of saying "it's her apple" you'd say "it's she apple"?
> That.....frankly doesn't make sense, or it breaks the English language in ways that I'm not familiar with Correct; it is massively ungrammatical. > Do you mean that instead of saying "it's her apple" you'd say "it's she apple"? No possessive form is indicated. But instead of saying "I gave it a dress", you would say "I gave she a dress".
Edit: looking at other comments, it seems like it might not be the correct explanation after all?