Earlier quoted context omitted.
as pointed out in the source > although it is clear in some places that inaccuracies and Ibn Fadlan's own prejudices have slanted the account to some extent. Seems a bit silly to believe she volunteered for that while also stating that there's "no way to know anything clearly" (except possibly the most absurd part?)
>Seems a bit silly to believe she volunteered for that People volunteered for some weird shit back in the day. Their morals and beliefs are nothing like ours.
regardless my point is it's silly to try to reconcile "we can't know anything" with this one details they pulled out. Like why is the single detail that somehow is credible?