Live data from Hacker News

Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now

tomshardware.com

11–20 of 156 posts

Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now

#11
post #8
post #5

This is great for the price. My main complaint is power consumption. Intel is still delivering wonderful performance, but the performance per watt isn’t great at all.

I'm generally most interested in performance at peak, and consumption at idle, since my usage typically bounces between those two extremes and spends little time in-between.

After owning an i9 for a while... I care about power usage because all the power gets turned into heat. i9s like to run HOT, even under fairly mild loads.

Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now

#12
post #5

This is great for the price. My main complaint is power consumption. Intel is still delivering wonderful performance, but the performance per watt isn’t great at all.

Is there a reason why people are so stressed over high power consumption in new CPUs? The majority of the time it wont use anywhere near that and I just accept it as a “stock OC”.

power = heat = noise.

I don't like noise.

Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now

#13
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there a reason why people are so stressed over high power consumption in new CPUs? The majority of the time it wont use anywhere near that and I just accept it as a “stock OC”.

power = heat = noise. I don't like noise.

Yes but either you need your computer to work and therefore you are willing to accept the fact that energy=work, or you don't need the computer to do anything in which case it will just sit there silently drawing ~1W.

Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now

#14
pretty impressive that FinFET has finally surpassed planar transistor clocks... just in time for the change to GAAFET! ;)

but seriously I heard arguments for a long time that bulldozer would probably be the highest-clocking LN2 CPU ever built, because of the combination of planar transistors and a frequency-optimized architecture. It seems like we stalled around 5 GHz forever with FinFET, and then 10ESF/Intel 7 just casually blows most of the way to 6 GHz in pretty much a single generation.

Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now

#16
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there a reason why people are so stressed over high power consumption in new CPUs? The majority of the time it wont use anywhere near that and I just accept it as a “stock OC”.

power = heat = noise. I don't like noise.

That’s more related to fan choice (Noctua is the pro move) but it’s still going to be idling most of the time.

Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now

#17
300w PL1/PL2 limits compared to 253 on the 13900k. I know these chips are made for specific reasons - to win benchmark crowns - but both Intel and AMD are cranking power through the roof to get the smallest of marginal gains. Such a waste.

Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now

#18
post #10

> Intel recently demoed the chip hitting 6 GHz on two cores with standard off-the-shelf Corsair AIO water cooling So only 2 cores. They forgot to say for how many microseconds can the chip sustain this speed. And 400 A ? Per nanosecond or what ? Thank god it will mainly wait for I/O and has enough time to cool itself. /s

> 400 A ? Per nanosecond or what ?

Amps are already over time — 1 amp is 1 coulomb (6e18 electrons) per second.

Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now

#19
post #10

> Intel recently demoed the chip hitting 6 GHz on two cores with standard off-the-shelf Corsair AIO water cooling So only 2 cores. They forgot to say for how many microseconds can the chip sustain this speed. And 400 A ? Per nanosecond or what ? Thank god it will mainly wait for I/O and has enough time to cool itself. /s

Nitpicking. And 400 A ? Per nanosecond or what ? Ampere are already coulomb per second.

Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now

#20
post #13
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

power = heat = noise. I don't like noise.

Yes but either you need your computer to work and therefore you are willing to accept the fact that energy=work, or you don't need the computer to do anything in which case it will just sit there silently drawing ~1W.

Or you choose a CPU that does more work per unit of energy because you value silence
Post reply on HN