This is great for the price. My main complaint is power consumption. Intel is still delivering wonderful performance, but the performance per watt isn’t great at all.
I'm generally most interested in performance at peak, and consumption at idle, since my usage typically bounces between those two extremes and spends little time in-between.
Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now
11–20 of 156 posts
Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now
#12This is great for the price. My main complaint is power consumption. Intel is still delivering wonderful performance, but the performance per watt isn’t great at all.
Is there a reason why people are so stressed over high power consumption in new CPUs? The majority of the time it wont use anywhere near that and I just accept it as a “stock OC”.
I don't like noise.
Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there a reason why people are so stressed over high power consumption in new CPUs? The majority of the time it wont use anywhere near that and I just accept it as a “stock OC”.
power = heat = noise. I don't like noise.
Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now
#14but seriously I heard arguments for a long time that bulldozer would probably be the highest-clocking LN2 CPU ever built, because of the combination of planar transistors and a frequency-optimized architecture. It seems like we stalled around 5 GHz forever with FinFET, and then 10ESF/Intel 7 just casually blows most of the way to 6 GHz in pretty much a single generation.
Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now
#15A $110 premium seems like a steal for being able to get the very top binned CPUs
Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there a reason why people are so stressed over high power consumption in new CPUs? The majority of the time it wont use anywhere near that and I just accept it as a “stock OC”.
power = heat = noise. I don't like noise.
Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now
#17Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now
#18> Intel recently demoed the chip hitting 6 GHz on two cores with standard off-the-shelf Corsair AIO water cooling So only 2 cores. They forgot to say for how many microseconds can the chip sustain this speed. And 400 A ? Per nanosecond or what ? Thank god it will mainly wait for I/O and has enough time to cool itself. /s
Amps are already over time — 1 amp is 1 coulomb (6e18 electrons) per second.
Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now
#19> Intel recently demoed the chip hitting 6 GHz on two cores with standard off-the-shelf Corsair AIO water cooling So only 2 cores. They forgot to say for how many microseconds can the chip sustain this speed. And 400 A ? Per nanosecond or what ? Thank god it will mainly wait for I/O and has enough time to cool itself. /s
Re: Intel Launches $699 Core I9-13900KS, the First 6 GHz CPU: Available Now
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
power = heat = noise. I don't like noise.
Yes but either you need your computer to work and therefore you are willing to accept the fact that energy=work, or you don't need the computer to do anything in which case it will just sit there silently drawing ~1W.