The underlying assumption here is that Sam would be willing to sell OpenAI. I don't think that's the case. There's no amount of money that Microsoft could throw at Sam to convince him to sell. Not only is he already wealthy, but he's also a true believer in AI. And unlike Snapchat, it's going to be very hard for incumbents to clone.
> And unlike Snapchat, it's going to be very hard for incumbents to clone We forgetting how Dall-E 2 was made irrelevant just a few weeks after release by Stable Diffusion? I agree with everything else you're saying though, I don't think he'd have any interest in selling it.
Microsoft will have to buy OpenAI in 2023
51–60 of 62 posts
Re: Microsoft will have to buy OpenAI in 2023
#52This might sound naive, but wasn't the founding principle behind OpenAI that it should prevent powers around AI being concentrated in the hands of nations or big companies? I really hope OpenAI won't get acquired.
Sam Altman addresses that when he was asked that question in 'How I Built This' Podcast. Essentially: OpenAI did not realize the massive scale they needed for them to be successful. When they realized this, they could not raise any funding as 'non-profit'. They asked govt, who did not want to fund it, and other sources, at the end they did not have any other recourse. Sam Altaman says: 90% of funding was needed for c…
Re: Microsoft will have to buy OpenAI in 2023
#53I think Microsoft is one of the few companies in the world that could replicate OpenAI's work. It's much easier to build something when you know it can be done and roughly how.
Re: Microsoft will have to buy OpenAI in 2023
#54Re: Microsoft will have to buy OpenAI in 2023
#55Re: Microsoft will have to buy OpenAI in 2023
#56I was listening to a podcast[1] and they say the cost of inference (responding to a question) in ChatGPT is about 1-2 cent. Is that true? And how would that map to the overall cost microsoft can pay for integrating that into Bing, considering number of search queries in Bing. 1- https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/06/podcasts/hard-fork-tiktok...
Elon Musk: What's the average cost per chat?
Sam Altman: average is probably single-digits cents per chat; trying to figure out more precisely and also how we can optimize it
--
Though I am not sure what per chat really means here. Per message?
Re: Microsoft will have to buy OpenAI in 2023
#57In order to remain competitive, OpenAI will need to make ChatGPT free. It's basically going to be a repeat of the browser war since all the major tech companies have their own version of AI that they can offer with their other products. The main issue is that they, OpenAI, don't have any other sources of revenue so they can't continue to give away the product without going broke. Yet, the big companies can do it fore…
Re: Microsoft will have to buy OpenAI in 2023
#58>AI similarly has powerful network effects. OpenAI's current business model is genius. By allowing free usage of chatGPT, they are getting millions of "free" employees, all actively and eagerly providing more data and more training to the system. I never buy this. This story is repeated so often in so many places. You hear it about Tesla all the time "Their dataset is so big because they have all those cars out there…
I doubt the data OpenAI receives from the usage of ChatGPT is even remotely close to the amount of data Google or Facebook handles that could be used to build a better language model. They have advantage over other AI startups, but I don't think they have much of an advantage over companies like Google and Facebook which both have massive amounts of data, money, and computing power. Which at the current state is the…
They have access to Microsoft's billions and the compute powers of Azure. The other day there was a HN post [1] about Microsoft has build a top 5 super computer. That computer is probably the computer OpenAI used to train their model on.
Re: Microsoft will have to buy OpenAI in 2023
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed. Google processes about 8.5 billion search queries daily. Conversational voice assistants process about 120 million queries daily.
> Agreed. Google processes about 8.5 billion search queries daily. Misstyped queries of mostly the same stuff. Google's real data advantage here is gmail. Billions of real conversations between real people.