Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Seems like a good idea. But no one (AFAIK) is trying to "excuse" criminal behavior even as we try to understand the causes. I think the knee jerk response would be about perspectives on poverty and class, but I think the more interesting response is that the criminal justice system already takes causes into account. Provoked Crimes of Passion are treated differently than premeditated ones. Questions of mental capaci…
>In reality, the justice system almost always takes causes into account. Just not all causes. The interesting question is why some but not others. Absolutely. Circumstances are usually relevant and should be examined. But GP[0] claimed that "progressives" argue that understanding the causes for the commission of crimes should "excuse" those actions. Which is an unsupported assertion and I reject it because, at least…
To be clear, I acknowledge that we’re talking about an extreme, broadly unpopular position, but it is one running through certain segments of leftish twitter and academia. (No, I don’t keep a file of such utterances, so I can’t produce a list offhand.)