Live data from Hacker News

Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

futurism.com

331–340 of 386 posts

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#331
post #318

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Phone holder. The law only applies to using a device held in your hand while driving.

You're saying the law allows a touch screen to be used if it's secured with a "holder" but not if it's.... bolted to the console at the factory?

Yes the law allows you to use navigation in your phone.

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#332
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Getting lost and staring at a map is vaguely dangerous. Having a map that gets you a clear answer faster is safer. This really doesn't seem controversial to me, it only seems so in this thread because "Tesla". If you frame it in other ways, it seems more obvious. Is anyone demanding that FedEx drivers or Doordashers use paper maps? Should your Uber driver pull over every time the route changes?

I agree that GPS makes finding where you are easier but it's a fallacy to pretend maps are hard to use. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature should be able to locate themselves on a map. It's only when you become so oblivious to your surroundings because you only know how ot listen to the GPS that this seems difficult...

It can take quite a lot of time to figure that out. If you see Street name and number, sure, with index you will find it. But slowly.

And when you don't see no named sign, it takes a lot more time to find the place on map.

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#333
Physical buttons outperform touchscreens in new cars, test finds (2022) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34283385 - Jan 2023 (104 comments)

Physical buttons outperform touchscreens in new cars, test finds - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32494497 - Aug 2022 (953 comments)

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#334
post #30

I would love to see some EU legislation about car dashboards. As an occasional driver of many different brands and types of vehicles, I continue to be amazed at the usability crimes being committed in the name of 'looking cool' (stated reason) as well as 'cost savings' (most likely the real reason). Any function that needs to be invoked or setting that needs to be changed by a reasonable person while driving should h…

When we bought our last car we specifically avoided touchscreen-heavy interfaces. Worst we looked at was Peugeot, which not only had framerate stuttering _on the actual digital dashboard_, the radio turned on loud for us and although the digital volume button was large, you couldn’t just hold it down - you needed to repeatedly tap/lift/tap/lift/… to move it more than just one volume notch. We bought a (non-peugeot) c…

My VAG car (VW/Audi/Skoda/SEAT/etc) has a great digital dash. It's super responsive, it's clear in all sun light, no framerate issues or anything.

I think digital dials and things like that are excellent and aren't a problem. These have been around for around 10 years now. They have clear benefits such as having navigation info up front, music info, customizable dials, speed as a number, etc.

Peugeot has always had shitty technology in their cars, they are a budget brand trying to be a premium brand.

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#335
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Generally, it only tends to come up in any area where the market seems to be failing consumers. This is interpreted as an externality that the market doesn't account for (in this case consumer safety, in the case of USB-C charging e-waste), which regulations are then introduced to correct for.

>>in this case consumer safety Ironic since safety laws is what put the screens in the cars in the first place, the regulation requiring backup camera's which required large screen to show the picture. >>in the case of USB-C charging e-waste lol, yea that is not the reason for USB-C regulation, nor was that needed at all, and that will handicap either the EU or global innovation. What ever comes next to replace USB-C…

There is no EU regulation that requires camera. Cars without cameras are easy to buy and usually cheaper then ones with camera.

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#337

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because leaving it "to the market" is always a race to the bottom, and there ends up being no choice on voting with your wallet.

You do know that Touch Screen got included in Cars due to government regulations right? The government mandated Backup Camera's and once you had to put in a screen to serve as display for the backup camera then it only makes since to use that screen for more and more things This is yet another unintended consequence of government regulations, where by now people want to use government regulation to "fix" the problems…

EU does not require backup or any other camera and cars frequently don't have it.

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#338
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What's the proper control to use for interacting with a navigation 1. Voice control 2. Pull over

Back in the day I did a long cross country trip with a Garmin 60CSx hiking GPS, held in my right hand, which I was also shifting with. I didn't use it for turn by turn navigation (not a fan, especially for road trips), but rather a detailed map with a live "you are here" indicator. To look at it, I held the unit halfway up and glanced down when I could naturally spare the attention. For input, I pushed the buttons wi…

FWIW, while safe, that would probably be illegal in many states you pass through due to hands-free device laws.

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#339
post #223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're right. I'm not. I'm not even convinced you're arguing in good faith any more, because frankly I can't imagine how a rational and empathetic individual could have reasoned themselves into these opinions. I'm not going to argue with you any more, because you're either a troll, or someone to who can't be reasoned out of their opinions simply because they didn't reason themselves into them.

>>I can't imagine how a rational and empathetic Empathy and rationality are often in conflict, you seem to side more on the empathetic side where I do not. I am purely on the logical / rational side and freely admit to having very low Empathy. >>someone to who can't be reasoned out of their opinions simply because they didn't reason themselves I literally linked to a site called Reason.com.... It provides a very reas…

Logic and rationality are not inherently opposed to empathy.

That being said, one does not need to be empath to value not causing accidents to other people. "This will lead to more accidents" is both logical and rational claim.

The ideological investment into idea that one must be selfish to max to look "logical" is irrational.

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#340

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nobody ever demanded touch screens. Cars already had navigation built in that had no touch screens nor a need for them. Car companies choosing cheap, substandard designs to save a buck is something the car companies decided on. The market being a race to the bottom is visible in every single space where only a few companies control an entire industry. From supermarkets to cars, from soft drinks to tech, when competit…

>>where only a few companies control an entire industry. I feel like we are now into the absurd... You know what kills competition. REGULATION. Every industry where you can cite limited competition I can tell you the regulations that killed that competition. Unregulated industries have LOTS of innovation and competition. Regulated industries have slow innovation and no competition. Free market work because of competi…

> I feel like we are now into the absurd... You know what kills competition. REGULATION.

That is absurd.

Regulation takes many forms, and if you think that monopolies are only broken by reducing regulation, then there isn't any point in continuing this conversation.

Post reply on HN