Live data from Hacker News

Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]

github.com

281–290 of 500 posts

Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]

#281
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like it or not, Pepe did get co-opted by a weird alt-right subculture, so while it later got reclaimed, for a while there was a good chance posting Pepe meant you were aligned with the alt-right or incel culture. There's an entire documentary on the artist behind it and what happened called "Feels Good Man" it's really quite good: https://www.feelsgoodmanfilm.com/

I remember very well that Pepe was used by all sides until some article on the Hillary Clinton's campaign website in 2016 that associated it with Trump and then suddenly you couldn't use it for anything with being labelled white supremacist

It's not surprising at all for the Hillary campaign to have completely misjudged and misunderstood something in an attempt to engage with online or youth culture.

I'm reminded of her awkward "I'm just chillin ... in Cedar Rapids!" vine

Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]

#282
post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> - Made a mod removing all non-white characters in a video game. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=15187... “Edit 26-mar-2020: finally, the injustice has been corrected: all races are welcome! You can choose the range of skin colors you want in mod settings.” > - Put black people and artists who draw black people in a category/folder called "n". this doesn’t really mean anything. > - Is allegedl…

I don't really see how that Steam link is supposed to be helping their case here... Yeah sure, you can change the settings on the mod called "Whites Only", and we are supposed to be like "oh, ok, I guess thats fine then"?

This was created in response to existing mods which had removed all white people

You can call it immature, I sure would, but still we can't have 'rules for thee'

Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]

#283

Apparently it's been reinstated? https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/ - At least I could access it now.

This is a win. Good on Github. I was about to hound Nat to swing around a bat at his former stomping grounds.

EDIT: Stripped some commentary about 4chan. I try to avoid editing like this, but the ban was for an entirely different reason, so it was needlessly provocative.

Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]

#284
There is another theory that I haven't seen discussed in any other comment threads here:

that the anti-ai-art campaign people would have reported the repo en masse.

This has been done previously for several Patreon and Kickstarter projects, with at least one popular anti-ai-art Discord server having a channel where people do nothing but share links for users to bulk report.

Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]

#285
post #204

Regardless of what the author of the repo did or did not do, I think that deleting his account and everything in it is a failure on the part of github and warrants a policy change. There's lots of good knowledge contained in the issues and discussions hosted on the webui repo all of which are now lost or very hard to find. Even papers coming from big companies have directly used the repo as reference[1]. I was person…

Agreed. This is social media style moderation being applied to a website that is more similar to infrastructure or a library. If I were a member of a private, professional library* and a colleague was found to hold racist views or had submitted a racist paper, I would still find it unacceptable to see that all of their books and papers had been indiscriminately pulled off the shelves overnight. In fact, such a thing…

> This is social media style moderation being applied to a website that is more similar to infrastructure or a library.

I don't know anything about the immediate situation here but calling GitHub "infrastructure" is not accurate. I know every man and his dog hosts their repos there but GitHub is a private company (owned by Microsoft!) and is not obliged to host things that it thinks will make it look bad.

Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]

#286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> they really should quote a specific violation of specific TOS when they close your account. I suspect this ends up being impractical, due to helping the bad actors too much. I think moderation being so inconsistent/unclear is mostly because moderation is difficult.

Imagine if we used the same logic for law enforcement. "We can't tell you what's illegal because that would help bad actors. Also, not knowing the law is not a defence for violating it."

[deleted]

Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]

#287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You should also mention there are two counterpart mods called "black only" and "yellow only"

Released at least two years after the original WhiteOnly mod: "Edit 26-mar-2020: finally, the injustice has been corrected: all races are welcome! You can choose the range of skin colors you want in mod settings." https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=15187...

Nah, BlackOnly was released on the same day [1] and YellowOnly two days later. They were merged in 2020 to WhiteOnly.

[1] https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=15188...

Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]

#289
post #204

Regardless of what the author of the repo did or did not do, I think that deleting his account and everything in it is a failure on the part of github and warrants a policy change. There's lots of good knowledge contained in the issues and discussions hosted on the webui repo all of which are now lost or very hard to find. Even papers coming from big companies have directly used the repo as reference[1]. I was person…

Agreed. This is social media style moderation being applied to a website that is more similar to infrastructure or a library. If I were a member of a private, professional library* and a colleague was found to hold racist views or had submitted a racist paper, I would still find it unacceptable to see that all of their books and papers had been indiscriminately pulled off the shelves overnight. In fact, such a thing…

[flagged]

Re: Automatic1111's GitHub account suspended for "ToS violations" [restored]

#290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed. This is social media style moderation being applied to a website that is more similar to infrastructure or a library. If I were a member of a private, professional library* and a colleague was found to hold racist views or had submitted a racist paper, I would still find it unacceptable to see that all of their books and papers had been indiscriminately pulled off the shelves overnight. In fact, such a thing…

> This is social media style moderation being applied to a website that is more similar to infrastructure or a library. I don't know anything about the immediate situation here but calling GitHub "infrastructure" is not accurate. I know every man and his dog hosts their repos there but GitHub is a private company (owned by Microsoft!) and is not obliged to host things that it thinks will make it look bad.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN