Live data from Hacker News

Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs

techemails.com

181–190 of 398 posts

Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs

#181
post #155
post #57

I don’t understand Jobs’ logic here. Is he just a bully? If Google makes such a great offer that his employee will leave him, shouldn’t he try to make a better offer, or meet with the employee instead of calling Sergey? Say he did get the offer canceled. How would this employee feel about working for a CEO that does this?

Is he just a bully? From everything I've read in the last twenty years, there was not one single facet of Steve Jobs' life in which he was not a bully.

This is also my impression after reading Isaacson's biography and Creativity, Inc. At Pixar, he behaved like a feudal lord because he pretty much owned the place and they relied on his money to keep the lights on.

Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They had a mutual non compete going. Here’s another instance where a cold recruiting email was “against policy”: https://twitter.com/TechEmails/status/1443263744906305543?s=...

Had?

e-mails were released as part of an antipoaching lawsuit (wage supression/wage theft); Apple, Google and others settled.

https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/apple-google-others-...

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-google-lawsuit-idUS...

Even by then most of those same companies had already settle another case that included ending those agreements:

https://www.cnet.com/culture/doj-settles-no-recruit-claims-a...

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-requires-s...

Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs

#183
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The dude basically chose to die of treatable cancer in his 50s because he just didn't like the idea of getting medical treatment. That's one of the most odd behaviors I've ever heard of.

Plenty of incredibly smart people think and do incredibly stupid things. Isaac Newton was one of the greatest mathematicians and physicists of history, inventor of the telescope, father of Newtonian mechanics, and a key figure of the Enlightenment. Yet he considered that scientific work of lesser importance, spending much of his effort studying the occult, biblical interpretation, and alchemy.

“Stupid” isn’t the word I would use for following your interests rather than what others would like you to do

Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Had?

e-mails were released as part of an antipoaching lawsuit (wage supression/wage theft); Apple, Google and others settled. https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/apple-google-others-... https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-google-lawsuit-idUS... Even by then most of those same companies had already settle another case that included ending those agreements: https://www.cnet.com/culture/doj-settles-no-recruit-claims…

I’m not sure how the laws work but from reading that justice.gov link, anti poaching agreements are illegal and are actually enforceable, right?

Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs

#185
post #165
post #57

I don’t understand Jobs’ logic here. Is he just a bully? If Google makes such a great offer that his employee will leave him, shouldn’t he try to make a better offer, or meet with the employee instead of calling Sergey? Say he did get the offer canceled. How would this employee feel about working for a CEO that does this?

His job is to create an environment where Apple makes a lot of money. If strategically important employees go from Apple to Google, Apple is quite likely to make less money. From that point on the game theory is fairly obvious and the rest is a question of style. May as well get angry; sometimes it works. It isn't optimum behaviour but at that level it'll be quite common. There aren't a lot of strategies to choose fr…

As for how he treated people he had actual power over, I would call the label of “bully” quite appropriate

Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs

#186
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Is he just a bully? LMAO. Yes. And a bad person.

I think it’s simpler than that. He was an average person. Had a lot of business acumen, particularly well timed vision (after a bunch of poor timing), then he was a really successful guy who was just as flawed as the rest of us.

What disappoints me the most is that people treat him as an inventor, when he invented nothing, his engineers did.

Dennis Ritchie as an example deserves way more respect than Jobs the buffoon.

But if you make "pop" devices to be sold to the layman, you are great in the public eye.

Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs

#187
post #57

I don’t understand Jobs’ logic here. Is he just a bully? If Google makes such a great offer that his employee will leave him, shouldn’t he try to make a better offer, or meet with the employee instead of calling Sergey? Say he did get the offer canceled. How would this employee feel about working for a CEO that does this?

"Pure capitalism", or "war" as Steve Jobs put it in one of his emails, is a race to the bottom in terms of company profits because of countless scenarios like this. I want employee X because he will bring $Y value to me, so I can technically pay anything below $Y for him. But then your company also has similar logic. If we simply aggressively compete then these cost of any employee, who has a skillset where supply Th…

It's not a race to the bottom. It's a race to the point where Supply&Demand curves intersect.

P.S. if it was a race to the bottom, consider that only 1.5% of the labor force works at minimum wage.

Re: Sergey Brin: Irate Call from Steve Jobs

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

e-mails were released as part of an antipoaching lawsuit (wage supression/wage theft); Apple, Google and others settled. https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/apple-google-others-... https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-google-lawsuit-idUS... Even by then most of those same companies had already settle another case that included ending those agreements: https://www.cnet.com/culture/doj-settles-no-recruit-claims…

I’m not sure how the laws work but from reading that justice.gov link, anti poaching agreements are illegal and are actually enforceable, right?

And that is in the infamous anti-worker US; though I think you meant unenforceable (the companies wouldn't be able to use the legal system to enforce them)

In the rest of the world Steve Jobs / Apple would have been in a bigger trouble just from the start of the emails.

Post reply on HN