Live data from Hacker News

Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

help.twitter.com

51–60 of 790 posts

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#55

FB and IG banned but Snap, TikTok, LinkedIn or YouTube are fine?

Would be hard to ban any mention of or links to YouTube, since it's not "just" a social media platform, but also used for video hosting. Twitter of course hosts videos too, but it's a lot less advanced.

What is an advanced video ?

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#56

Seems reasonable. Let's all remember the spirit of '20, everyone: Twitter is a private company, if you don't like it build your own twitter!

Obviously people are building their own platforms, or else Elon wouldn’t feel the need for this policy.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#57

Seems reasonable. Let's all remember the spirit of '20, everyone: Twitter is a private company, if you don't like it build your own twitter!

People absolutely should. And people should also hold Musk to account for being a liar and a hypocrite. These things don't conflict.

No post body was provided.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#58

Seems reasonable. Let's all remember the spirit of '20, everyone: Twitter is a private company, if you don't like it build your own twitter!

It is, and they can do what they like! I have moved to Mastodon without too much fuss and I'm enjoying it so far.

Does that mean it's a good idea, that it's not rank hypocrisy, or that it's in any way in the spirit of a "marketplace of ideas"? No.

Let's say I was a person rooting for Twitter under Musk to succeed; even viewing it through that lens, this seems really really super dumb, and I can't imagine people sticking around if they can't promote their work elsewhere.

Post reply on HN