Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
51–60 of 790 posts
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#52"And by free speech, I meant less speech, obviously."
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#53Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#54This is, frankly, pathetic.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#55FB and IG banned but Snap, TikTok, LinkedIn or YouTube are fine?
Would be hard to ban any mention of or links to YouTube, since it's not "just" a social media platform, but also used for video hosting. Twitter of course hosts videos too, but it's a lot less advanced.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#56Seems reasonable. Let's all remember the spirit of '20, everyone: Twitter is a private company, if you don't like it build your own twitter!
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#57Seems reasonable. Let's all remember the spirit of '20, everyone: Twitter is a private company, if you don't like it build your own twitter!
People absolutely should. And people should also hold Musk to account for being a liar and a hypocrite. These things don't conflict.
Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy
#58Seems reasonable. Let's all remember the spirit of '20, everyone: Twitter is a private company, if you don't like it build your own twitter!
Does that mean it's a good idea, that it's not rank hypocrisy, or that it's in any way in the spirit of a "marketplace of ideas"? No.
Let's say I was a person rooting for Twitter under Musk to succeed; even viewing it through that lens, this seems really really super dumb, and I can't imagine people sticking around if they can't promote their work elsewhere.